mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transfer Learning for Structured Pruning under Limited Task Data

arXiv 2311.06382 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large, pre-trained models are problematic to use in resource constrained applications. Fortunately, task-aware structured pruning methods offer a solution. These approaches reduce model size by dropping structural units like layers and attention heads in a manner that takes into account the end-task. However, these pruning algorithms require more task-specific data than is typically available. We propose a framework which combines structured pruning with transfer learning to reduce the need for task-specific data. Our empirical results answer questions such as: How should the two tasks be coupled? What parameters should be transferred? And, when during training should transfer learning be introduced? Leveraging these insights, we demonstrate that our framework results in pruned models with improved generalization over strong baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2023.

Builds on

26 of 36 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  4. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  5. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  6. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  7. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
  8. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
  9. 2019TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understandingcited by 1,153
  10. 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 881
  11. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
  12. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 803
14 more
  1. 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 595
  2. 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 571
  3. 2019Reducing Transformer Depth on Demand with Structured Dropoutcited by 434
  4. 2020Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuningcited by 398
  5. 2018Multi-Task Identification of Entities, Relations, and Coreference for Scientific Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 321
  6. 2018Model compression via distillation and quantizationcited by 287
  7. 2019What's Hidden in a Randomly Weighted Neural Network?cited by 236
  8. 2019Structured Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 201
  9. 2015The Benefit of Multitask Representation Learningcited by 194
  10. 2017PubMed 200k RCT: a Dataset for Sequential Sentence Classification in Medical Abstractscited by 123
  11. 2021The Low-Resource Double Bind: An Empirical Study of Pruning for Low-Resource Machine Translationcited by 46
  12. 2019Non-Structured DNN Weight Pruning -- Is It Beneficial in Any Platform?cited by 31
  13. 2021Should We Be Pre-training? An Argument for End-task Aware Training as an Alternativecited by 26
  14. 2021Auxiliary Task Update Decomposition: The Good, The Bad and The Neutralcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.