mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Symbolic Regression as Feature Engineering Method for Machine and Deep Learning Regression Tasks

arXiv 2311.06028 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2023cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the realm of machine and deep learning regression tasks, the role of effective feature engineering (FE) is pivotal in enhancing model performance. Traditional approaches of FE often rely on domain expertise to manually design features for machine learning models. In the context of deep learning models, the FE is embedded in the neural network's architecture, making it hard for interpretation. In this study, we propose to integrate symbolic regression (SR) as an FE process before a machine learning model to improve its performance. We show, through extensive experimentation on synthetic and real-world physics-related datasets, that the incorporation of SR-derived features significantly enhances the predictive capabilities of both machine and deep learning regression models with 34-86% root mean square error (RMSE) improvement in synthetic datasets and 4-11.5% improvement in real-world datasets. In addition, as a realistic use-case, we show the proposed method improves the machine learning performance in predicting superconducting critical temperatures based on Eliashberg theory by more than 20% in terms of RMSE. These results outline the potential of SR as an FE component in data-driven models.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2023.

Builds on

22 of 95 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
  2. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 390
  3. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
  4. 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 227
  5. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
  6. 2017Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 208
  7. 2018Auto-Keras: An Efficient Neural Architecture Search Systemcited by 171
  8. 2017Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limitcited by 140
  9. 2021PySINDy: A comprehensive Python package for robust sparse system identificationcited by 89
  10. 2020Interpretability and Explainability: A Machine Learning Zoo Mini-tourcited by 55
  11. 2022Forecast Evaluation for Data Scientists: Common Pitfalls and Best Practicescited by 55
  12. 2018Where are we now? A large benchmark study of recent symbolic regression methodscited by 44
10 more
  1. 2022A computational framework for physics-informed symbolic regression with straightforward integration of domain knowledgecited by 31
  2. 2022AutoField: Automating Feature Selection in Deep Recommender Systemscited by 30
  3. 2017An Empirical Analysis of Feature Engineering for Predictive Modelingcited by 29
  4. 2021Shape-constrained Symbolic Regression -- Improving Extrapolation with Prior Knowledgecited by 27
  5. 2015Survey on Feature Selectioncited by 25
  6. 2018Relational Autoencoder for Feature Extractioncited by 23
  7. 2017Ease.ml: Towards Multi-tenant Resource Sharing for Machine Learning Workloadscited by 16
  8. 2022SubStrat: A Subset-Based Strategy for Faster AutoMLcited by 8
  9. 2017A Probabilistic Linear Genetic Programming with Stochastic Context-Free Grammar for solving Symbolic Regression problemscited by 3
  10. 2021Accelerating Genetic Programming using GPUscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.