mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparing Male Nyala and Male Kudu Classification using Transfer Learning with ResNet-50 and VGG-16

arXiv 2311.05981 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2023cs.CV cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable and efficient monitoring of wild animals is crucial to inform management and conservation decisions. The process of manually identifying species of animals is time-consuming, monotonous, and expensive. Leveraging on advances in deep learning and computer vision, we investigate in this paper the efficiency of pre-trained models, specifically the VGG-16 and ResNet-50 model, in identifying a male Kudu and a male Nyala in their natural habitats. These pre-trained models have proven to be efficient in animal identification in general. Still, there is little research on animals like the Kudu and Nyala, who are usually well camouflaged and have similar features. The method of transfer learning used in this paper is the fine-tuning method. The models are evaluated before and after fine-tuning. The experimental results achieved an accuracy of 93.2% and 97.7% for the VGG-16 and ResNet-50 models, respectively, before fine-tuning and 97.7% for both models after fine-tuning. Although these results are impressive, it should be noted that they were taken over a small sample size of 550 images split in half between the two classes; therefore, this might not cater to enough scenarios to get a full conclusion of the efficiency of the models. Therefore, there is room for more work in getting a more extensive dataset and testing and extending to the female counterparts of these species and the whole antelope species.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2023.

Builds on

1 of 16 references.

References · 1

  1. 2018SpotTune: Transfer Learning through Adaptive Fine-tuningcited by 168

Built on by

Not cited yet.