mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ABIGX: A Unified Framework for eXplainable Fault Detection and Classification

arXiv 2311.05316 ↗First posted 9 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

For explainable fault detection and classification (FDC), this paper proposes a unified framework, ABIGX (Adversarial fault reconstruction-Based Integrated Gradient eXplanation). ABIGX is derived from the essentials of previous successful fault diagnosis methods, contribution plots (CP) and reconstruction-based contribution (RBC). It is the first explanation framework that provides variable contributions for the general FDC models. The core part of ABIGX is the adversarial fault reconstruction (AFR) method, which rethinks the FR from the perspective of adversarial attack and generalizes to fault classification models with a new fault index. For fault classification, we put forward a new problem of fault class smearing, which intrinsically hinders the correct explanation. We prove that ABIGX effectively mitigates this problem and outperforms the existing gradient-based explanation methods. For fault detection, we theoretically bridge ABIGX with conventional fault diagnosis methods by proving that CP and RBC are the linear specifications of ABIGX. The experiments evaluate the explanations of FDC by quantitative metrics and intuitive illustrations, the results of which show the general superiority of ABIGX to other advanced explanation methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2023.

Builds on

12 of 42 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  6. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  7. 2016What do different evaluation metrics tell us about saliency models?cited by 185
  8. 2017An approach to reachability analysis for feed-forward ReLU neural networkscited by 127
  9. 2021Guided Integrated Gradients: An Adaptive Path Method for Removing Noisecited by 102
  10. 2017Maximum Resilience of Artificial Neural Networkscited by 97
  11. 2021Exploring Counterfactual Explanations Through the Lens of Adversarial Examples: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysiscited by 52
  12. 2020Semantics and explanation: why counterfactual explanations produce adversarial examples in deep neural networkscited by 24

Built on by

Not cited yet.