Deep Hashing via Householder Quantization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hashing is at the heart of large-scale image similarity search, and recent methods have been substantially improved through deep learning techniques. Such algorithms typically learn continuous embeddings of the data. To avoid a subsequent costly binarization step, a common solution is to employ loss functions that combine a similarity learning term (to ensure similar images are grouped to nearby embeddings) and a quantization penalty term (to ensure that the embedding entries are close to binarized entries, e.g., -1 or 1). Still, the interaction between these two terms can make learning harder and the embeddings worse. We propose an alternative quantization strategy that decomposes the learning problem in two stages: first, perform similarity learning over the embedding space with no quantization; second, find an optimal orthogonal transformation of the embeddings so each coordinate of the embedding is close to its sign, and then quantize the transformed embedding through the sign function. In the second step, we parametrize orthogonal transformations using Householder matrices to efficiently leverage stochastic gradient descent. Since similarity measures are usually invariant under orthogonal transformations, this quantization strategy comes at no cost in terms of performance. The resulting algorithm is unsupervised, fast, hyperparameter-free and can be run on top of any existing deep hashing or metric learning algorithm. We provide extensive experimental results showing that this approach leads to state-of-the-art performance on widely used image datasets, and, unlike other quantization strategies, brings consistent improvements in performance to existing deep hashing algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2023.
Builds on
22 of 58 references.
References · 22
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2020Proxy Anchor Loss for Deep Metric Learningcited by 195
- 2017HashNet: Deep Learning to Hash by Continuationcited by 121
- 2016A Survey on Learning to Hashcited by 119
- 2020Efficient Riemannian Optimization on the Stiefel Manifold via the Cayley Transformcited by 79
- 2019Trivializations for Gradient-Based Optimization on Manifoldscited by 78
- 2019Central Similarity Quantization for Efficient Image and Video Retrievalcited by 77
- 2015Feature Learning based Deep Supervised Hashing with Pairwise Labelscited by 59
- 2020A Survey on Deep Hashing Methodscited by 47
- 2015Simultaneous Feature Learning and Hash Coding with Deep Neural Networkscited by 44
10 more
- 2021One Loss for All: Deep Hashing with a Single Cosine Similarity based Learning Objectivecited by 43
- 2015Supervised Discrete Hashingcited by 40
- 2021A Survey on Locality Sensitive Hashing Algorithms and their Applicationscited by 40
- 2017Deep Supervised Discrete Hashingcited by 36
- 2017Asymmetric Deep Supervised Hashingcited by 35
- 2013Beyond Locality-Sensitive Hashingcited by 23
- 2022One Loss for Quantization: Deep Hashing with Discrete Wasserstein Distributional Matchingcited by 9
- 2020What if Neural Networks had SVDs?cited by 8
- 2018Deep Priority Hashingcited by 4
- 2022HyP2 Loss: Beyond Hypersphere Metric Space for Multi-label Image Retrievalcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.