mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Personality Style Recognition via Machine Learning: Identifying Anaclitic and Introjective Personality Styles from Patients' Speech

arXiv 2311.04088 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In disentangling the heterogeneity observed in psychopathology, personality of the patients is considered crucial. While it has been demonstrated that personality traits are reflected in the language used by a patient, we hypothesize that this enables automatic inference of the personality type directly from speech utterances, potentially more accurately than through a traditional questionnaire-based approach explicitly designed for personality classification. To validate this hypothesis, we adopt natural language processing (NLP) and standard machine learning tools for classification. We test this on a dataset of recorded clinical diagnostic interviews (CDI) on a sample of 79 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) -- a condition for which differentiated treatment based on personality styles has been advocated -- and classified into anaclitic and introjective personality styles. We start by analyzing the interviews to see which linguistic features are associated with each style, in order to gain a better understanding of the styles. Then, we develop automatic classifiers based on (a) standardized questionnaire responses; (b) basic text features, i.e., TF-IDF scores of words and word sequences; (c) more advanced text features, using LIWC (linguistic inquiry and word count) and context-aware features using BERT (bidirectional encoder representations from transformers); (d) audio features. We find that automated classification with language-derived features (i.e., based on LIWC) significantly outperforms questionnaire-based classification models. Furthermore, the best performance is achieved by combining LIWC with the questionnaire features. This suggests that more work should be put into developing linguistically based automated techniques for characterizing personality, however questionnaires still to some extent complement such methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2023.

Builds on

8 of 73 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  4. 2021Self-Guided Contrastive Learning for BERT Sentence Representationscited by 103
  5. 2020RobBERT: a Dutch RoBERTa-based Language Modelcited by 88
  6. 2018Investigating Audio, Visual, and Text Fusion Methods for End-to-End Automatic Personality Predictioncited by 22
  7. 2020Personality Trait Detection Using Bagged SVM over BERT Word Embedding Ensemblescited by 20
  8. 2020Acoustic Correlates of the Voice Qualifiers: A Surveycited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.