DAIL: Data Augmentation for In-Context Learning via Self-Paraphrase
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In-Context Learning (ICL) combined with pre-trained large language models has achieved promising results on various NLP tasks. However, ICL requires high-quality annotated demonstrations which might not be available in real-world scenarios. To overcome this limitation, we propose Data Augmentation for In-Context Learning (DAIL). DAIL leverages the intuition that large language models are more familiar with the content generated by themselves. It first utilizes the language model to generate paraphrases of the test sample and employs majority voting to determine the final result based on individual predictions. Our extensive empirical evaluation shows that DAIL outperforms the standard ICL method and other ensemble-based methods in the low-resource scenario. Additionally, we explore the use of voting consistency as a confidence score of the model when the logits of predictions are inaccessible. We believe our work will stimulate further research on ICL in low-resource settings.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2023.
Builds on
15 of 25 references.
References · 15
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
- 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 641
- 2022Selective Annotation Makes Language Models Better Few-Shot Learnerscited by 242
- 2023Chat-REC: Towards Interactive and Explainable LLMs-Augmented Recommender Systemcited by 241
- 2023Human-like Summarization Evaluation with ChatGPTcited by 126
- 2020On the Inference Calibration of Neural Machine Translationcited by 61
3 more
- 2022LOPS: Learning Order Inspired Pseudo-Label Selection for Weakly Supervised Text Classificationcited by 11
- 2023tasksource: A Dataset Harmonization Framework for Streamlined NLP Multi-Task Learning and Evaluationcited by 11
- 2023SELFOOD: Self-Supervised Out-Of-Distribution Detection via Learning to Rankcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for Reasoningcited by 69
- 2024DALK: Dynamic Co-Augmentation of LLMs and KG to answer Alzheimer's Disease Questions with Scientific Literaturecited by 50
- 2024Contextualization Distillation from Large Language Model for Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 18
- 2024LLMCheckup: Conversational Examination of Large Language Models via Interpretability Tools and Self-Explanationscited by 16
- 2024READ: Improving Relation Extraction from an ADversarial Perspectivecited by 0
- 2025Learning LLM Preference over Intra-Dialogue Pairs: A Framework for Utterance-level Understandingscited by 0
- 2025Learning LLM Preference over Intra-Dialogue Pairs: A Framework for Utterance-level Understandings7 Mar 2025
- 2024DALK: Dynamic Co-Augmentation of LLMs and KG to answer Alzheimer's Disease Questions with Scientific Literature8 May 2024
- 2024READ: Improving Relation Extraction from an ADversarial Perspective2 Apr 2024
- 2024Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for Reasoning29 Mar 2024
- 2024Contextualization Distillation from Large Language Model for Knowledge Graph Completion28 Jan 2024
- 2024LLMCheckup: Conversational Examination of Large Language Models via Interpretability Tools and Self-Explanations23 Jan 2024