mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Survey of the Various Methodologies Towards making Artificial Intelligence More Explainable

arXiv 2311.02291 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2023cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machines are being increasingly used in decision-making processes, resulting in the realization that decisions need explanations. Unfortunately, an increasing number of these deployed models are of a 'black-box' nature where the reasoning behind the decisions is unknown. Hence, there is a need for clarity behind the reasoning of these decisions. As humans, we would want these decisions to be presented to us in an explainable manner. However, explanations alone are insufficient. They do not necessarily tell us how to achieve an outcome but merely tell us what achieves the given outcome. For this reason, my research focuses on explainability/interpretability and how it extends to counterfactual thinking.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2023.

Builds on

7 of 36 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  2. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  3. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 297
  4. 2019Explainable AI for Trees: From Local Explanations to Global Understandingcited by 65
  5. 2014Falling Rule Listscited by 59
  6. 2020Don't Explain without Verifying Veracity: An Evaluation of Explainable AI with Video Activity Recognitioncited by 11
  7. 2018Induction of Non-Monotonic Logic Programs to Explain Boosted Tree Models Using LIMEcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.