mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Potential of Wearable Sensors for Assessing Patient Acuity in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

arXiv 2311.02251 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.AI eess.SPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Acuity assessments are vital in critical care settings to provide timely interventions and fair resource allocation. Traditional acuity scores rely on manual assessments and documentation of physiological states, which can be time-consuming, intermittent, and difficult to use for healthcare providers. Furthermore, such scores do not incorporate granular information such as patients' mobility level, which can indicate recovery or deterioration in the ICU. We hypothesized that existing acuity scores could be potentially improved by employing Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques in conjunction with Electronic Health Records (EHR) and wearable sensor data. In this study, we evaluated the impact of integrating mobility data collected from wrist-worn accelerometers with clinical data obtained from EHR for developing an AI-driven acuity assessment score. Accelerometry data were collected from 86 patients wearing accelerometers on their wrists in an academic hospital setting. The data was analyzed using five deep neural network models: VGG, ResNet, MobileNet, SqueezeNet, and a custom Transformer network. These models outperformed a rule-based clinical score (SOFA= Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) used as a baseline, particularly regarding the precision, sensitivity, and F1 score. The results showed that while a model relying solely on accelerometer data achieved limited performance (AUC 0.50, Precision 0.61, and F1-score 0.68), including demographic information with the accelerometer data led to a notable enhancement in performance (AUC 0.69, Precision 0.75, and F1-score 0.67). This work shows that the combination of mobility and patient information can successfully differentiate between stable and unstable states in critically ill patients.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2023.

Builds on

13 of 27 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  6. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  7. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  8. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  9. 2021Deep Learning in Human Activity Recognition with Wearable Sensors: A Review on Advancescited by 54
  10. 2022Attention Mechanism in Neural Networks: Where it Comes and Where it Goescited by 29
  11. 2018DeepSOFA: A Continuous Acuity Score for Critically Ill Patients using Clinically Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 22
  12. 2023Transformers in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 17
1 more
  1. 2018Human Activity Recognition Based on Wearable Sensor Data: A Standardization of the State-of-the-Artcited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.