mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpretability is not Explainability: New Quantitative XAI Approach with a focus on Recommender Systems in Education

arXiv 2311.02078 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2023cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence faces challenges due to the absence of a widely accepted taxonomy that facilitates the quantitative evaluation of explainability in Machine Learning algorithms. In this paper, we propose a novel taxonomy that addresses the current gap in the literature by providing a clear and unambiguous understanding of the key concepts and relationships in XAI. Our approach is rooted in a systematic analysis of existing definitions and frameworks, with a focus on transparency, interpretability, completeness, complexity and understandability as essential dimensions of explainability. This comprehensive taxonomy aims to establish a shared vocabulary for future research. To demonstrate the utility of our proposed taxonomy, we examine a case study of a Recommender System designed to curate and recommend the most suitable online resources from MERLOT. By employing the SHAP package, we quantify and enhance the explainability of the RS within the context of our newly developed taxonomy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2023.

Builds on

8 of 17 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  3. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  4. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  5. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  6. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  7. 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 227
  8. 2017The Promise and Peril of Human Evaluation for Model Interpretabilitycited by 52

Built on by

Not cited yet.