Variable Selection in Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Interpretable Distribution Comparison
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study two-sample variable selection: identifying variables that discriminate between the distributions of two sets of data vectors. Such variables help scientists understand the mechanisms behind dataset discrepancies. Although domain-specific methods exist (e.g., in medical imaging, genetics, and computational social science), a general framework remains underdeveloped. We make two separate contributions. (i) We introduce a mathematical notion of the discriminating set of variables: the largest subset containing no variables whose marginals are identical across the two distributions and independent of the remaining variables. We prove this set is uniquely defined and establish further properties, making it a suitable ground truth for theory and evaluation. (ii) We propose two methods for two-sample variable selection that assign weights to variables and optimise them to maximise the power of a kernel two-sample test while enforcing sparsity to downweight redundant variables. To select the regularisation parameter - unknown in practice, as it controls the number of selected variables - we develop two data-driven procedures to balance recall and precision. Synthetic experiments show improved performance over baselines, and we illustrate the approach on two applications using datasets from water-pipe and traffic networks.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2023.
Builds on
13 of 61 references.
References · 13
- 2019StarGAN v2: Diverse Image Synthesis for Multiple Domainscited by 1,095
- 2016Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 258
- 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 129
- 2016Generative Models and Model Criticism via Optimized Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 99
- 2021MMD Aggregated Two-Sample Testcited by 74
- 2016Interpretable Distribution Features with Maximum Testing Powercited by 63
- 2018Counterfactual Mean Embeddingscited by 32
- 2023Model Based Explanations of Concept Driftcited by 19
- 2018Post Selection Inference with Incomplete Maximum Mean Discrepancy Estimatorcited by 11
- 2018Global and Local Two-Sample Tests via Regressioncited by 11
- 2023Variable Selection for Kernel Two-Sample Testscited by 7
- 2015Principal Differences Analysis: Interpretable Characterization of Differences between Distributionscited by 6
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2026Post Hoc Inference for Component Attribution in Multivariate Change-Point Detectioncited by 2
- 2024Variable Selection for Comparing High-dimensional Time-Series Datacited by 1
- 2024On the Limitation of Kernel Dependence Maximization for Feature Selectioncited by 0
- 2025MMD-Flagger: Leveraging Maximum Mean Discrepancy to Detect Hallucinationscited by 0
- 2025Word Sense Detection Leveraging Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 0
- 2026Post Hoc Inference for Component Attribution in Multivariate Change-Point Detection16 Jul 2026
- 2025Word Sense Detection Leveraging Maximum Mean Discrepancy2 Jun 2025
- 2025MMD-Flagger: Leveraging Maximum Mean Discrepancy to Detect Hallucinations2 Jun 2025
- 2024Variable Selection for Comparing High-dimensional Time-Series Data9 Dec 2024
- 2024On the Limitation of Kernel Dependence Maximization for Feature Selection11 Jun 2024