mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

REAL: Resilience and Adaptation using Large Language Models on Autonomous Aerial Robots

arXiv 2311.01403 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2023cs.ROcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on internet-scale datasets have shown impressive capabilities in code understanding, synthesis, and general purpose question-and-answering. Key to their performance is the substantial prior knowledge acquired during training and their ability to reason over extended sequences of symbols, often presented in natural language. In this work, we aim to harness the extensive long-term reasoning, natural language comprehension, and the available prior knowledge of LLMs for increased resilience and adaptation in autonomous mobile robots. We introduce REAL, an approach for REsilience and Adaptation using LLMs. REAL provides a strategy to employ LLMs as a part of the mission planning and control framework of an autonomous robot. The LLM employed by REAL provides (i) a source of prior knowledge to increase resilience for challenging scenarios that the system had not been explicitly designed for; (ii) a way to interpret natural-language and other log/diagnostic information available in the autonomy stack, for mission planning; (iii) a way to adapt the control inputs using minimal user-provided prior knowledge about the dynamics/kinematics of the robot. We integrate REAL in the autonomy stack of a real multirotor, querying onboard an offboard LLM at 0.1-1.0 Hz as part the robot's mission planning and control feedback loops. We demonstrate in real-world experiments the ability of the LLM to reduce the position tracking errors of a multirotor under the presence of (i) errors in the parameters of the controller and (ii) unmodeled dynamics. We also show (iii) decision making to avoid potentially dangerous scenarios (e.g., robot oscillates) that had not been explicitly accounted for in the initial prompt design.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 12; 2026: 2.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Real-Time Anomaly Detection and Reactive Planning with Large Language Modelscited by 67
  2. 2025UAVs Meet LLMs: Overviews and Perspectives Toward Agentic Low-Altitude Mobilitycited by 48
  3. 2024Large Language Models for UAVs: Current State and Pathways to the Futurecited by 33
  4. 2025Safety Guardrails for LLM-Enabled Robotscited by 30
  5. 2024SPINE: Online Semantic Planning for Missions with Incomplete Natural Language Specifications in Unstructured Environmentscited by 16
  6. 2025SkyVLN: Vision-and-Language Navigation and NMPC Control for UAVs in Urban Environmentscited by 14
  7. 2025Air-Ground Collaboration for Language-Specified Missions in Unknown Environmentscited by 11
  8. 2025Distilling On-device Language Models for Robot Planning with Minimal Human Interventioncited by 10
  9. 2025Next-Generation LLM for UAV: From Natural Language to Autonomous Flightcited by 10
  10. 2025Agentic UAVs: LLM-Driven Autonomy with Integrated Tool-Calling and Cognitive Reasoningcited by 7
  11. 2023Segment Any Events via Weighted Adaptation of Pivotal Tokenscited by 5
  12. 2024Jailbreaking LLM-Controlled Robotscited by 4
7 more
  1. 2025Compositional Coordination for Multi-Robot Teams with Large Language Modelscited by 3
  2. 2025Efficient Navigation in Unknown Indoor Environments with Vision-Language Modelscited by 2
  3. 2025PIP-LLM: Integrating PDDL-Integer Programming with LLMs for Coordinating Multi-Robot Teams Using Natural Languagecited by 2
  4. 2025Mathematical Reasoning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A RAG-Based Approach for Complex Arithmetic Reasoningcited by 0
  5. 2025LEO-RobotAgent: A General-purpose Robotic Agent for Language-driven Embodied Operatorcited by 0
  6. 2026Test-Driven Agentic Framework for Reliable Robot Controllercited by 0
  7. 2026Hierarchical LLM-Driven Control for HAPS-Assisted UAV Networks: Joint Optimization of Flight and Connectivitycited by 0