mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adversarially Robust Distributed Count Tracking via Partial Differential Privacy

arXiv 2311.00346 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2023cs.DS cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the distributed tracking model, also known as distributed functional monitoring. This model involves k sites each receiving a stream of items and communicating with the central server. The server's task is to track a function of all items received thus far continuously, with minimum communication cost. For count tracking, it is known that there is a √k gap in communication between deterministic and randomized algorithms. However, existing randomized algorithms assume an "oblivious adversary" who constructs the entire input streams before the algorithm starts. Here we consider adaptive adversaries who can choose new items based on previous answers from the algorithm. Deterministic algorithms are trivially robust to adaptive adversaries, while randomized ones may not. Therefore, we investigate whether the √k advantage of randomized algorithms is from randomness itself or the oblivious adversary assumption. We provide an affirmative answer to this question by giving a robust algorithm with optimal communication. Existing robustification techniques do not yield optimal bounds due to the inherent challenges of the distributed nature of the problem. To address this, we extend the differential privacy framework by introducing "partial differential privacy" and proving a new generalization theorem. This theorem may have broader applications beyond robust count tracking, making it of independent interest.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.

Builds on

21 of 41 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 103
  2. 2015Algorithmic Stability for Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 88
  3. 2015Generalization in Adaptive Data Analysis and Holdout Reusecited by 83
  4. 2019A New Analysis of Differential Privacy's Generalization Guaranteescited by 36
  5. 2017Calibrating Noise to Variance in Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 29
  6. 2017Generalization for Adaptively-chosen Estimators via Stable Mediancited by 26
  7. 2020A Framework for Adversarially Robust Streaming Algorithmscited by 21
  8. 2020Adversarially Robust Streaming Algorithms via Differential Privacycited by 21
  9. 2019The Adversarial Robustness of Samplingcited by 18
  10. 2021Dynamic Algorithms Against an Adaptive Adversary: Generic Constructions and Lower Boundscited by 17
  11. 2018The Limits of Post-Selection Generalizationcited by 16
  12. 2020Tight Bounds for Adversarially Robust Streams and Sliding Windows via Difference Estimatorscited by 16
9 more
  1. 2021Adversarial Robustness of Streaming Algorithms through Importance Samplingcited by 13
  2. 2020On Adaptive Distance Estimationcited by 10
  3. 2021A Framework for Adversarial Streaming via Differential Privacy and Difference Estimatorscited by 9
  4. 2021Adversarially Robust Streaming via Dense--Sparse Trade-offscited by 7
  5. 2023Optimal Fully Dynamic k-Center Clustering for Adaptive and Oblivious Adversariescited by 6
  6. 2022On the Robustness of CountSketch to Adaptive Inputscited by 5
  7. 2021Adversarially Robust Coloring for Graph Streamscited by 3
  8. 2019Optimal Random Sampling from Distributed Streams Revisitedcited by 1
  9. 2020Learning Based Distributed Trackingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.