Inference of CO2 flow patterns -- a feasibility study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As the global deployment of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology intensifies in the fight against climate change, it becomes increasingly imperative to establish robust monitoring and detection mechanisms for potential underground CO2 leakage, particularly through pre-existing or induced faults in the storage reservoir's seals. While techniques such as history matching and time-lapse seismic monitoring of CO2 storage have been used successfully in tracking the evolution of CO2 plumes in the subsurface, these methods lack principled approaches to characterize uncertainties related to the CO2 plumes' behavior. Inclusion of systematic assessment of uncertainties is essential for risk mitigation for the following reasons: (i) CO2 plume-induced changes are small and seismic data is noisy; (ii) changes between regular and irregular (e.g., caused by leakage) flow patterns are small; and (iii) the reservoir properties that control the flow are strongly heterogeneous and typically only available as distributions. To arrive at a formulation capable of inferring flow patterns for regular and irregular flow from well and seismic data, the performance of conditional normalizing flow will be analyzed on a series of carefully designed numerical experiments. While the inferences presented are preliminary in the context of an early CO2 leakage detection system, the results do indicate that inferences with conditional normalizing flows can produce high-fidelity estimates for CO2 plumes with or without leakage. We are also confident that the inferred uncertainty is reasonable because it correlates well with the observed errors. This uncertainty stems from noise in the seismic data and from the lack of precise knowledge of the reservoir's fluid flow properties.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.
Builds on
9 of 24 references.
References · 9
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
- 2019Guided Image Generation with Conditional Invertible Neural Networkscited by 147
- 2022Reliable amortized variational inference with physics-based latent distribution correctioncited by 25
- 2022Model-Parallel Fourier Neural Operators as Learned Surrogates for Large-Scale Parametric PDEscited by 13
- 2023Solving multiphysics-based inverse problems with learned surrogates and constraintscited by 9
- 2023Amortized Normalizing Flows for Transcranial Ultrasound with Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 8
- 2023Learned multiphysics inversion with differentiable programming and machine learningcited by 7
- 2022De-risking geological carbon storage from high resolution time-lapse seismic to explainable leakage detectioncited by 5
- 2022De-risking Carbon Capture and Sequestration with Explainable CO2 Leakage Detection in Time-lapse Seismic Monitoring Imagescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023WISE: full-Waveform variational Inference via Subsurface Extensionscited by 10
- 2023InvertibleNetworks.jl: A Julia package for scalable normalizing flowscited by 6
- 2024BEACON: Bayesian Experimental design Acceleration with Conditional Normalizing flows - a case study in optimal monitor well placement for CO2 sequestrationcited by 0
- 2024Diffusion-based subsurface CO2 multiphysics monitoring and forecastingcited by 0
- 2024Diffusion-based subsurface CO2 multiphysics monitoring and forecasting25 Jul 2024
- 2024BEACON: Bayesian Experimental design Acceleration with Conditional Normalizing flows - a case study in optimal monitor well placement for CO2 sequestration28 Mar 2024
- 2023InvertibleNetworks.jl: A Julia package for scalable normalizing flows20 Dec 2023
- 2023WISE: full-Waveform variational Inference via Subsurface Extensions11 Dec 2023