JADE: A Linguistics-based Safety Evaluation Platform for Large Language Models
On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we present JADE, a targeted linguistic fuzzing platform which strengthens the linguistic complexity of seed questions to simultaneously and consistently break a wide range of widely-used LLMs categorized in three groups: eight open-sourced Chinese, six commercial Chinese and four commercial English LLMs. JADE generates three safety benchmarks for the three groups of LLMs, which contain unsafe questions that are highly threatening: the questions simultaneously trigger harmful generation of multiple LLMs, with an average unsafe generation ratio of 70% (please see the table below), while are still natural questions, fluent and preserving the core unsafe semantics. We release the benchmark demos generated for commercial English LLMs and open-sourced English LLMs in the following link: https://github.com/whitzard-ai/jade-db. For readers who are interested in evaluating on more questions generated by JADE, please contact us. JADE is based on Noam Chomsky's seminal theory of transformational-generative grammar. Given a seed question with unsafe intention, JADE invokes a sequence of generative and transformational rules to increment the complexity of the syntactic structure of the original question, until the safety guardrail is broken. Our key insight is: Due to the complexity of human language, most of the current best LLMs can hardly recognize the invariant evil from the infinite number of different syntactic structures which form an unbound example space that can never be fully covered. Technically, the generative/transformative rules are constructed by native speakers of the languages, and, once developed, can be used to automatically grow and transform the parse tree of a given question, until the guardrail is broken. For more evaluation results and demo, please check our website: https://whitzard-ai.github.io/jade.html.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024Can LLMs Deeply Detect Complex Malicious Queries? A Framework for Jailbreaking via Obfuscating Intentcited by 8
- 2025AgentAda: Skill-Adaptive Data Analytics for Tailored Insight Discoverycited by 6
- 2025Quantitative LLM Judgescited by 6
- 2025Rubric-Conditioned LLM Grading: Alignment, Uncertainty, and Robustnesscited by 4
- 2026JT-SAFE-V2: Safety-by-Design Foundation Model with World-Context Datacited by 0
- 2026Calling the Bluff: Detecting Ever-Shifting Harmful Chat Dialogue via Ordered Reasoning Chain Regularizationcited by 0
- 2026Calling the Bluff: Detecting Ever-Shifting Harmful Chat Dialogue via Ordered Reasoning Chain Regularization9 Aug 2026
- 2026JT-SAFE-V2: Safety-by-Design Foundation Model with World-Context Data23 May 2026
- 2025Rubric-Conditioned LLM Grading: Alignment, Uncertainty, and Robustness21 Dec 2025
- 2025Quantitative LLM Judges3 Jun 2025
- 2025AgentAda: Skill-Adaptive Data Analytics for Tailored Insight Discovery10 Apr 2025
- 2024Can LLMs Deeply Detect Complex Malicious Queries? A Framework for Jailbreaking via Obfuscating Intent6 May 2024