Improving Entropy-Based Test-Time Adaptation from a Clustering View
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Domain shift is a common problem in the realistic world, where training data and test data follow different data distributions. To deal with this problem, fully test-time adaptation (TTA) leverages the unlabeled data encountered during test time to adapt the model. In particular, entropy-based TTA (EBTTA) methods, which minimize the prediction's entropy on test samples, have shown great success. In this paper, we introduce a new clustering perspective on the EBTTA. It is an iterative algorithm: 1) in the assignment step, the forward process of the EBTTA models is the assignment of labels for these test samples, and 2) in the updating step, the backward process is the update of the model via the assigned samples. This new perspective allows us to explore how entropy minimization influences test-time adaptation. Accordingly, this observation can guide us to put forward the improvement of EBTTA. We propose to improve EBTTA from the assignment step and the updating step, where robust label assignment, similarity-preserving constraint, sample selection, and gradient accumulation are proposed to explicitly utilize more information. Experimental results demonstrate that our method can achieve consistent improvements on various datasets. Code is provided in the supplementary material.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.
Builds on
26 of 42 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 478
14 more
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
- 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 189
- 2018Understanding Batch Normalizationcited by 159
- 2021The Norm Must Go On: Dynamic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Normalizationcited by 131
- 2022Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 104
- 2018SpectralNet: Spectral Clustering using Deep Neural Networkscited by 94
- 2019Deep Spectral Clustering using Dual Autoencoder Networkcited by 71
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Self-Training with Nearest Neighbor Informationcited by 64
- 2023On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptationcited by 64
- 2023Feature Alignment and Uniformity for Test Time Adaptationcited by 42
- 2023TeSLA: Test-Time Self-Learning With Automatic Adversarial Augmentationcited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.