Metric Flows with Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We develop a general theory of flows in the space of Riemannian metrics induced by neural network gradient descent. This is motivated in part by recent advances in approximating Calabi-Yau metrics with neural networks and is enabled by recent advances in understanding flows in the space of neural networks. We derive the corresponding metric flow equations, which are governed by a metric neural tangent kernel, a complicated, non-local object that evolves in time. However, many architectures admit an infinite-width limit in which the kernel becomes fixed and the dynamics simplify. Additional assumptions can induce locality in the flow, which allows for the realization of Perelman's formulation of Ricci flow that was used to resolve the 3d Poincar'e conjecture. We demonstrate that such fixed kernel regimes lead to poor learning of numerical Calabi-Yau metrics, as is expected since the associated neural networks do not learn features. Conversely, we demonstrate that well-learned numerical metrics at finite-width exhibit an evolving metric-NTK, associated with feature learning. Our theory of neural network metric flows therefore explains why neural networks are better at learning Calabi-Yau metrics than fixed kernel methods, such as the Ricci flow.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2023.
Builds on
15 of 54 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,131
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
- 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 723
- 2020Finite Versus Infinite Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 156
- 2019Neural Tangents: Fast and Easy Infinite Neural Networks in Pythoncited by 149
- 2020Tensor Programs II: Neural Tangent Kernel for Any Architecturecited by 139
- 2022Fast Finite Width Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 62
- 2020Neural Networks and Quantum Field Theorycited by 58
3 more
- 2020Neural Network Approximations for Calabi-Yau Metricscited by 32
- 2021Learning Size and Shape of Calabi-Yau Spacescited by 28
- 2021Building Quantum Field Theories Out of Neuronscited by 27
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
9 papers.
- 2024Rigor with Machine Learning from Field Theory to the Poincar'e Conjecturecited by 12
- 2024Deep Learning as Ricci Flowcited by 4
- 2026Neural and numerical methods for G2-structures on contact Calabi-Yau 7-manifoldscited by 4
- 2026Minimising Willmore Energy via Neural Flowcited by 4
- 2024Generative AI for Brane Configurations and Coamoebacited by 2
- 2026Minimal surfaces, Knots, and Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2024Learning 3-Manifold Triangulationscited by 1
- 2025Machine Learning the 6d Supergravity Landscapecited by 0
- 2026A user's guide to PINNs in geometric analysis: lessons from the asymptotic Plateau problemcited by 0
- 2026A user's guide to PINNs in geometric analysis: lessons from the asymptotic Plateau problem30 Jul 2026
- 2026Minimal surfaces, Knots, and Neural Networks25 May 2026
- 2026Minimising Willmore Energy via Neural Flow6 Apr 2026
- 2026Neural and numerical methods for G2-structures on contact Calabi-Yau 7-manifolds12 Feb 2026
- 2025Machine Learning the 6d Supergravity Landscape22 May 2025
- 2024Generative AI for Brane Configurations and Coamoeba25 Nov 2024
- 2024Learning 3-Manifold Triangulations15 May 2024
- 2024Deep Learning as Ricci Flow22 Apr 2024
- 2024Rigor with Machine Learning from Field Theory to the Poincar'e Conjecture20 Feb 2024