Explaining Tree Model Decisions in Natural Language for Network Intrusion Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Network intrusion detection (NID) systems which leverage machine learning have been shown to have strong performance in practice when used to detect malicious network traffic. Decision trees in particular offer a strong balance between performance and simplicity, but require users of NID systems to have background knowledge in machine learning to interpret. In addition, they are unable to provide additional outside information as to why certain features may be important for classification. In this work, we explore the use of large language models (LLMs) to provide explanations and additional background knowledge for decision tree NID systems. Further, we introduce a new human evaluation framework for decision tree explanations, which leverages automatically generated quiz questions that measure human evaluators' understanding of decision tree inference. Finally, we show LLM generated decision tree explanations correlate highly with human ratings of readability, quality, and use of background knowledge while simultaneously providing better understanding of decision boundaries.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2023.
Builds on
10 of 24 references.
References · 10
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2022Graph Rationalization with Environment-based Augmentationscited by 70
- 2020NetFlow Datasets for Machine Learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 45
- 2023Large Language Models are Built-in Autoregressive Search Enginescited by 26
- 2022Towards Explaining Autonomy with Verbalised Decision Tree Statescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 70
- 2023User Modeling in the Era of Large Language Models: Current Research and Future Directionscited by 18
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 9
- 2025eX-NIDS: A Framework for Explainable Network Intrusion Detection Leveraging Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2024DoLLM: How Large Language Models Understanding Network Flow Data to Detect Carpet Bombing DDoScited by 4
- 2025Large Language Models for Network Intrusion Detection Systems: Foundations, Implementations, and Future Directionscited by 4
- 2024XG-NID: Dual-Modality Network Intrusion Detection using a Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network and Large Language Modelcited by 2
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Survey13 Sep 2025
- 2025eX-NIDS: A Framework for Explainable Network Intrusion Detection Leveraging Large Language Models22 Jul 2025
- 2025Large Language Models for Network Intrusion Detection Systems: Foundations, Implementations, and Future Directions7 Jul 2025
- 2024XG-NID: Dual-Modality Network Intrusion Detection using a Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network and Large Language Model27 Aug 2024
- 2024DoLLM: How Large Language Models Understanding Network Flow Data to Detect Carpet Bombing DDoS13 May 2024
- 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Review6 May 2024
- 2023User Modeling in the Era of Large Language Models: Current Research and Future Directions11 Dec 2023