mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predicting recovery following stroke: deep learning, multimodal data and feature selection using explainable AI

arXiv 2310.19174 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2023cs.AI cs.CY cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning offers great potential for automated prediction of post-stroke symptoms and their response to rehabilitation. Major challenges for this endeavour include the very high dimensionality of neuroimaging data, the relatively small size of the datasets available for learning, and how to effectively combine neuroimaging and tabular data (e.g. demographic information and clinical characteristics). This paper evaluates several solutions based on two strategies. The first is to use 2D images that summarise MRI scans. The second is to select key features that improve classification accuracy. Additionally, we introduce the novel approach of training a convolutional neural network (CNN) on images that combine regions-of-interest extracted from MRIs, with symbolic representations of tabular data. We evaluate a series of CNN architectures (both 2D and a 3D) that are trained on different representations of MRI and tabular data, to predict whether a composite measure of post-stroke spoken picture description ability is in the aphasic or non-aphasic range. MRI and tabular data were acquired from 758 English speaking stroke survivors who participated in the PLORAS study. The classification accuracy for a baseline logistic regression was 0.678 for lesion size alone, rising to 0.757 and 0.813 when initial symptom severity and recovery time were successively added. The highest classification accuracy 0.854 was observed when 8 regions-of-interest was extracted from each MRI scan and combined with lesion size, initial severity and recovery time in a 2D Residual Neural Network.Our findings demonstrate how imaging and tabular data can be combined for high post-stroke classification accuracy, even when the dataset is small in machine learning terms. We conclude by proposing how the current models could be improved to achieve even higher levels of accuracy using images from hospital scanners.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2023.

Builds on

14 of 58 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  4. 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,424
  5. 2015Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Predictioncited by 1,062
  6. 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 366
  7. 2019Med3D: Transfer Learning for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 282
  8. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
  9. 2019Measurable Counterfactual Local Explanations for Any Classifiercited by 48
  10. 2018End-To-End Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis and Biomarker Identificationcited by 12
  11. 2021Contrastive Counterfactual Visual Explanations With Overdeterminationcited by 7
  12. 2022Deep neural network heatmaps capture Alzheimer's disease patterns reported in a large meta-analysis of neuroimaging studiescited by 6
2 more
  1. 2018Predicting Language Recovery after Stroke with Convolutional Networks on Stitched MRIcited by 1
  2. 2021Counterfactual Instances Explain Littlecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.