mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Apple Tasting: Combinatorial Dimensions and Minimax Rates

arXiv 2310.19064 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In online binary classification under apple tasting feedback, the learner only observes the true label if it predicts ``1". First studied by citehelmbold2000apple, we revisit this classical partial-feedback setting and study online learnability from a combinatorial perspective. We show that the Littlestone dimension continues to provide a tight quantitative characterization of apple tasting in the agnostic setting, closing an open question posed by citehelmbold2000apple. In addition, we give a new combinatorial parameter, called the Effective width, that tightly quantifies the minimax expected mistakes in the realizable setting. As a corollary, we use the Effective width to establish a trichotomy of the minimax expected number of mistakes in the realizable setting. In particular, we show that in the realizable setting, the expected number of mistakes of any learner, under apple tasting feedback, can be Theta(1), Theta(√T), or Theta(T). This is in contrast to the full-information realizable setting where only Theta(1) and Theta(T) are possible.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2023.

Builds on

6 of 19 references.

References · 6

  1. 2015Online Learning with Feedback Graphs: Beyond Banditscited by 79
  2. 2021Adversarial Laws of Large Numbers and Optimal Regret in Online Classificationcited by 39
  3. 2013The price of bandit information in multiclass online classificationcited by 24
  4. 2023List Online Classificationcited by 16
  5. 2023Multiclass Online Learnability under Bandit Feedbackcited by 12
  6. 2023Online Learning with Set-Valued Feedbackcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.