Blacksmith: Fast Adversarial Training of Vision Transformers via a Mixture of Single-step and Multi-step Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the remarkable success achieved by deep learning algorithms in various domains, such as computer vision, they remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations. Adversarial Training (AT) stands out as one of the most effective solutions to address this issue; however, single-step AT can lead to Catastrophic Overfitting (CO). This scenario occurs when the adversarially trained network suddenly loses robustness against multi-step attacks like Projected Gradient Descent (PGD). Although several approaches have been proposed to address this problem in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), we found out that they do not perform well when applied to Vision Transformers (ViTs). In this paper, we propose Blacksmith, a novel training strategy to overcome the CO problem, specifically in ViTs. Our approach utilizes either of PGD-2 or Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) randomly in a mini-batch during the adversarial training of the neural network. This will increase the diversity of our training attacks, which could potentially mitigate the CO issue. To manage the increased training time resulting from this combination, we craft the PGD-2 attack based on only the first half of the layers, while FGSM is applied end-to-end. Through our experiments, we demonstrate that our novel method effectively prevents CO, achieves PGD-2 level performance, and outperforms other existing techniques including N-FGSM, which is the state-of-the-art method in fast training for CNNs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2023.
Builds on
21 of 27 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
9 more
- 2013Speech Recognition with Deep Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 669
- 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 328
- 2022When Adversarial Training Meets Vision Transformers: Recipes from Training to Architecturecited by 64
- 2021Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial Trainingcited by 59
- 2022Make Some Noise: Reliable and Efficient Single-Step Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
- 2021Pyramid Adversarial Training Improves ViT Performancecited by 39
- 2022Towards Efficient Adversarial Training on Vision Transformerscited by 30
- 2020Adversarial Training and Provable Robustness: A Tale of Two Objectivescited by 12
- 2020Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Large Perturbationscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026SORA: Free Second-Order Attacks in Fast Adversarial Training30 May 2026