Stability of Random Forests and Coverage of Random-Forest Prediction Intervals
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We establish stability of random forests under the mild condition that the squared response (Y2) does not have a heavy tail. In particular, our analysis holds for the practical version of random forests that is implemented in popular packages like textttrandomForest in textttR. Empirical results show that stability may persist even beyond our assumption and hold for heavy-tailed Y2. Using the stability property, we prove a non-asymptotic lower bound for the coverage probability of prediction intervals constructed from the out-of-bag error of random forests. With another mild condition that is typically satisfied when Y is continuous, we also establish a complementary upper bound, which can be similarly established for the jackknife prediction interval constructed from an arbitrary stable algorithm. We also discuss the asymptotic coverage probability under assumptions weaker than those considered in previous literature. Our work implies that random forests, with its stability property, is an effective machine learning method that can provide not only satisfactory point prediction but also justified interval prediction at almost no extra computational cost.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2023.
Builds on
8 of 34 references.
References · 8
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
- 2019Predictive inference with the jackknife+cited by 211
- 2015A Random Forest Guided Tourcited by 168
- 2014Consistency of random forestscited by 85
- 2020Predictive Inference Is Free with the Jackknife+-after-Bootstrapcited by 55
- 2013Concentration in unbounded metric spaces and algorithmic stabilitycited by 22
- 2023Bagging Provides Assumption-free Stabilitycited by 19
- 2013Narrowing the Gap: Random Forests In Theory and In Practicecited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Synthetic Data Generation for Augmenting Small Samplescited by 3
- 2025Leave-One-Out Stable Conformal Predictioncited by 3
- 2024Towards Stable Machine Learning Model Retraining via Slowly Varying Sequencescited by 2
- 2024The Role of Depth, Width, and Tree Size in Expressiveness of Deep Forestcited by 0
- 2025Leave-One-Out Stable Conformal Prediction16 Apr 2025
- 2025Synthetic Data Generation for Augmenting Small Samples30 Jan 2025
- 2024The Role of Depth, Width, and Tree Size in Expressiveness of Deep Forest6 Jul 2024
- 2024Towards Stable Machine Learning Model Retraining via Slowly Varying Sequences28 Mar 2024