mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Data Ambiguity Strikes Back: How Documentation Improves GPT's Text-to-SQL

arXiv 2310.18742 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2023cs.DBcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-SQL allows experts to use databases without in-depth knowledge of them. However, real-world tasks have both query and data ambiguities. Most works on Text-to-SQL focused on query ambiguities and designed chat interfaces for experts to provide clarifications. In contrast, the data management community has long studied data ambiguities, but mainly addresses error detection and correction, rather than documenting them for disambiguation in data tasks. This work delves into these data ambiguities in real-world datasets. We have identified prevalent data ambiguities of value consistency, data coverage, and data granularity that affect tasks. We examine how documentation, originally made to help humans to disambiguate data, can help GPT-4 with Text-to-SQL tasks. By offering documentation on these, we found GPT-4's performance improved by 28.9%.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

11 papers.