mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MPrompt: Exploring Multi-level Prompt Tuning for Machine Reading Comprehension

arXiv 2310.18167 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The large language models have achieved superior performance on various natural language tasks. One major drawback of such approaches is they are resource-intensive in fine-tuning new datasets. Soft-prompt tuning presents a resource-efficient solution to fine-tune the pre-trained language models (PLMs) while keeping their weight frozen. Existing soft prompt methods mainly focus on designing the input-independent prompts that steer the model to fit the domain of the new dataset. Those methods often ignore the fine-grained information about the task and context of the text. In this paper, we propose a multi-level prompt tuning (MPrompt) method for machine reading comprehension. It utilizes prompts at task-specific, domain-specific, and context-specific levels to enhance the comprehension of input semantics at different granularities. We also propose an independence constraint to steer each domain-specific prompt to focus on information within its domain to avoid redundancy. Moreover, we present a prompt generator that incorporates context-related knowledge in the prompt generation to enhance contextual relevancy. We conducted extensive experiments on 12 benchmarks of various QA formats and achieved an average improvement of 1.94% over the state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2023.

Builds on

35 of 50 references.

References · 35

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  6. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  7. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  8. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  9. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  10. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  11. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  12. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
23 more
  1. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  2. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
  3. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
  4. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  5. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  6. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
  7. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
  8. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
  9. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
  10. 2017The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challengecited by 590
  11. 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 475
  12. 2016NewsQA: A Machine Comprehension Datasetcited by 330
  13. 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
  14. 2019QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Compositioncited by 248
  15. 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 241
  16. 2022UnifiedQA-v2: Stronger Generalization via Broader Cross-Format Trainingcited by 57
  17. 2020A Survey on Machine Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 41
  18. 2022XPrompt: Exploring the Extreme of Prompt Tuningcited by 30
  19. 2021Control Prefixes for Parameter-Efficient Text Generationcited by 23
  20. 2021Question Answering Survey: Directions, Challenges, Datasets, Evaluation Matricescited by 17
  21. 2023Causality and Independence Enhancement for Biased Node Classificationcited by 13
  22. 2021Response Generation with Context-Aware Prompt Learningcited by 12
  23. 2022Understanding and Improving Zero-shot Multi-hop Reasoning in Generative Question Answeringcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.