Comparison of Cross-Entropy, Dice, and Focal Loss for Sea Ice Type Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Up-to-date sea ice charts are crucial for safer navigation in ice-infested waters. Recently, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models show the potential to accelerate the generation of ice maps for large regions. However, results from CNN models still need to undergo scrutiny as higher metrics performance not always translate to adequate outputs. Sea ice type classes are imbalanced, requiring special treatment during training. We evaluate how three different loss functions, some developed for imbalanced class problems, affect the performance of CNN models trained to predict the dominant ice type in Sentinel-1 images. Despite the fact that Dice and Focal loss produce higher metrics, results from cross-entropy seem generally more physically consistent.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2023.
Builds on
6 of 17 references.
References · 6
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
- 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 620
Built on by
Not cited yet.