mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Critic-Driven Decoding for Mitigating Hallucinations in Data-to-text Generation

arXiv 2310.16964 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hallucination of text ungrounded in the input is a well-known problem in neural data-to-text generation. Many methods have been proposed to mitigate it, but they typically require altering model architecture or collecting additional data, and thus cannot be easily applied to an existing model. In this paper, we explore a new way to mitigate hallucinations by combining the probabilistic output of a generator language model (LM) with the output of a special "text critic" classifier, which guides the generation by assessing the match between the input data and the text generated so far. Our method does not need any changes to the underlying LM's architecture or training procedure and can thus be combined with any model and decoding operating on word probabilities. The critic does not need any additional training data, using the base LM's training data and synthetic negative examples. Our experimental results show that our method improves over the baseline on the WebNLG and OpenDialKG benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2023.

Builds on

19 of 27 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  4. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  5. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  6. 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 598
  7. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 503
  8. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 376
  9. 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
  10. 2021Q2: Evaluating Factual Consistency in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues via Question Generation and Question Answeringcited by 132
  11. 2020Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Modelscited by 108
  12. 2020Controlled Hallucinations: Learning to Generate Faithfully from Noisy Datacited by 84
7 more
  1. 2021Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selectioncited by 76
  2. 2021Increasing Faithfulness in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue with Controllable Featurescited by 74
  3. 2020Evaluating Semantic Accuracy of Data-to-Text Generation with Natural Language Inferencecited by 43
  4. 2018Pragmatically Informative Image Captioning with Character-Level Inferencecited by 42
  5. 2021Controlling Hallucinations at Word Level in Data-to-Text Generationcited by 41
  6. 2020Have Your Text and Use It Too! End-to-End Neural Data-to-Text Generation with Semantic Fidelitycited by 35
  7. 2020Revisiting Challenges in Data-to-Text Generation with Fact Groundingcited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.