ConDefects: A New Dataset to Address the Data Leakage Concern for LLM-based Fault Localization and Program Repair
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the growing interest on Large Language Models (LLMs) for fault localization and program repair, ensuring the integrity and generalizability of the LLM-based methods becomes paramount. The code in existing widely-adopted benchmarks for these tasks was written before the the bloom of LLMs and may be included in the training data of existing popular LLMs, thereby suffering from the threat of data leakage, leading to misleadingly optimistic performance metrics. To address this issue, we introduce "ConDefects", a novel dataset of real faults meticulously curated to eliminate such overlap. ConDefects contains 1,254 Java faulty programs and 1,625 Python faulty programs. All these programs are sourced from the online competition platform AtCoder and were produced between October 2021 and September 2023. We pair each fault with fault locations and the corresponding repaired code versions, making it tailored for in fault localization and program repair related research. We also provide interfaces for selecting subsets based on different time windows and coding task difficulties. While inspired by LLM-based tasks, ConDefects can be adopted for benchmarking ALL types of fault localization and program repair methods. The dataset is publicly available, and a demo video can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22j15Hj5ONk.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2023.
Builds on
15 of 28 references.
References · 15
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
- 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
- 2021CodeNet: A Large-Scale AI for Code Dataset for Learning a Diversity of Coding Taskscited by 200
- 2018SequenceR: Sequence-to-Sequence Learning for End-to-End Program Repaircited by 145
- 2023An Analysis of the Automatic Bug Fixing Performance of ChatGPTcited by 110
- 2023Impact of Code Language Models on Automated Program Repaircited by 85
- 2023Large Language Models for Test-Free Fault Localizationcited by 67
- 2023Can we trust the evaluation on ChatGPT?cited by 63
- 2023A Survey of Learning-based Automated Program Repaircited by 55
- 2023Copiloting the Copilots: Fusing Large Language Models with Completion Engines for Automated Program Repaircited by 55
- 2021Applying CodeBERT for Automated Program Repair of Java Simple Bugscited by 44
3 more
- 2023A study on Prompt Design, Advantages and Limitations of ChatGPT for Deep Learning Program Repaircited by 26
- 2023How Effective are Large Language Models in Generating Software Specifications?cited by 12
- 2021Extracting Concise Bug-Fixing Patches from Human-Written Patches in Version Control Systemscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025LessLeak-Bench: A First Investigation of Data Leakage in LLMs Across 83 Software Engineering Benchmarkscited by 37
- 2024Forgetting Curve: A Reliable Method for Evaluating Memorization Capability for Long-context Modelscited by 13
- 2023Turbulence: Systematically and Automatically Testing Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models for Codecited by 9
- 2025Benchmarking AI Models in Software Engineering: A Review, Search Tool, and Unified Approach for Elevating Benchmark Qualitycited by 4
- 2025Benchmarking AI Models in Software Engineering: A Review, Search Tool, and Unified Approach for Elevating Benchmark Quality7 Mar 2025
- 2025LessLeak-Bench: A First Investigation of Data Leakage in LLMs Across 83 Software Engineering Benchmarks10 Feb 2025
- 2024Forgetting Curve: A Reliable Method for Evaluating Memorization Capability for Long-context Models7 Oct 2024
- 2023Turbulence: Systematically and Automatically Testing Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models for Code22 Dec 2023