The Safety Challenges of Deep Learning in Real-World Type 1 Diabetes Management
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Blood glucose simulation allows the effectiveness of type 1 diabetes (T1D) management strategies to be evaluated without patient harm. Deep learning algorithms provide a promising avenue for extending simulator capabilities; however, these algorithms are limited in that they do not necessarily learn physiologically correct glucose dynamics and can learn incorrect and potentially dangerous relationships from confounders in training data. This is likely to be more important in real-world scenarios, as data is not collected under strict research protocol. This work explores the implications of using deep learning algorithms trained on real-world data to model glucose dynamics. Free-living data was processed from the OpenAPS Data Commons and supplemented with patient-reported tags of challenging diabetes events, constituting one of the most detailed real-world T1D datasets. This dataset was used to train and evaluate state-of-the-art glucose simulators, comparing their prediction error across safety critical scenarios and assessing the physiological appropriateness of the learned dynamics using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). While deep learning prediction accuracy surpassed the widely-used mathematical simulator approach, the model deteriorated in safety critical scenarios and struggled to leverage self-reported meal and exercise information. SHAP value analysis also indicated the model had fundamentally confused the roles of insulin and carbohydrates, which is one of the most basic T1D management principles. This work highlights the importance of considering physiological appropriateness when using deep learning to model real-world systems in T1D and healthcare more broadly, and provides recommendations for building models that are robust to real-world data constraints.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2023.
Builds on
8 of 75 references.
References · 8
- 2022A Survey on Offline Reinforcement Learning: Taxonomy, Review, and Open Problemscited by 228
- 2021Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 89
- 2017Dilated Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 83
- 2019Explaining black box decisions by Shapley cohort refinementcited by 26
- 2021Explanation of Machine Learning Models Using Shapley Additive Explanation and Application for Real Data in Hospitalcited by 17
- 2022Towards Safe Mechanical Ventilation Treatment Using Deep Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2018Deep Multi-Output Forecasting: Learning to Accurately Predict Blood Glucose Trajectoriescited by 15
- 2020Learning Insulin-Glucose Dynamics in the Wildcited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.