FedSplitX: Federated Split Learning for Computationally-Constrained Heterogeneous Clients
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models (FMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in machine learning but demand extensive training data and computational resources. Federated learning (FL) addresses the challenges posed by FMs, especially related to data privacy and computational burdens. However, FL on FMs faces challenges in situations with heterogeneous clients possessing varying computing capabilities, as clients with limited capabilities may struggle to train the computationally intensive FMs. To address these challenges, we propose FedSplitX, a novel FL framework that tackles system heterogeneity. FedSplitX splits a large model into client-side and server-side components at multiple partition points to accommodate diverse client capabilities. This approach enables clients to collaborate while leveraging the server's computational power, leading to improved model performance compared to baselines that limit model size to meet the requirement of the poorest client. Furthermore, FedSplitX incorporates auxiliary networks at each partition point to reduce communication costs and delays while enhancing model performance. Our experiments demonstrate that FedSplitX effectively utilizes server capabilities to train large models, outperforming baseline approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2023.
Builds on
13 of 15 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,033
- 2018Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient datacited by 395
- 2020HeteroFL: Computation and Communication Efficient Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Clientscited by 337
- 2020SplitFed: When Federated Learning Meets Split Learningcited by 310
- 2018Distributed learning of deep neural network over multiple agentscited by 279
- 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 195
- 2021FjORD: Fair and Accurate Federated Learning under heterogeneous targets with Ordered Dropoutcited by 192
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024Synergizing Foundation Models and Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 14
- 2024The Impact of Cut Layer Selection in Split Federated Learningcited by 6
- 2026Rethinking LoRA for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning in Large Modelscited by 5
- 2025Collaborative Split Federated Learning with Parallel Training and Aggregationcited by 2
- 2025Integration of TinyML and LargeML: A Survey of 6G and Beyondcited by 0
- 2026Split Federated Learning Architectures for High-Accuracy and Low-Delay Model Trainingcited by 0
- 2026CoeF-SFL: Preserving Collaborative Server-Client Learning with Enhanced Communication Efficiencycited by 0
- 2026CoeF-SFL: Preserving Collaborative Server-Client Learning with Enhanced Communication Efficiency28 Sep 2026
- 2026Split Federated Learning Architectures for High-Accuracy and Low-Delay Model Training9 Mar 2026
- 2026Rethinking LoRA for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning in Large Models23 Feb 2026
- 2025Integration of TinyML and LargeML: A Survey of 6G and Beyond20 May 2025
- 2025Collaborative Split Federated Learning with Parallel Training and Aggregation22 Apr 2025
- 2024The Impact of Cut Layer Selection in Split Federated Learning20 Dec 2024
- 2024Synergizing Foundation Models and Federated Learning: A Survey18 Jun 2024