A Human-Robot Mutual Learning System with Affect-Grounded Language Acquisition and Differential Outcomes Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents a novel human-robot interaction setup for robot and human learning of symbolic language for identifying robot homeostatic needs. The robot and human learn to use and respond to the same language symbols that convey homeostatic needs and the stimuli that satisfy the homeostatic needs, respectively. We adopted a differential outcomes training (DOT) protocol whereby the robot provides feedback specific (differential) to its internal needs (e.g. `hunger') when satisfied by the correct stimulus (e.g. cookie). We found evidence that DOT can enhance the human's learning efficiency, which in turn enables more efficient robot language acquisition. The robot used in the study has a vocabulary similar to that of a human infant in the linguistic ``babbling'' phase. The robot software architecture is built upon a model for affect-grounded language acquisition where the robot associates vocabulary with internal needs (hunger, thirst, curiosity) through interactions with the human. The paper presents the results of an initial pilot study conducted with the interactive setup, which reveal that the robot's language acquisition achieves higher convergence rate in the DOT condition compared to the non-DOT control condition. Additionally, participants reported positive affective experiences, feeling of being in control, and an empathetic connection with the robot. This mutual learning (teacher-student learning) approach offers a potential contribution of facilitating cognitive interventions with DOT (e.g. for people with dementia) through increased therapy adherence as a result of engaging humans more in training tasks by taking an active teaching-learning role. The homeostatic motivational grounding of the robot's language acquisition has potential to contribute to more ecologically valid and social (collaborative/nurturing) interactions with robots.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2023.
Builds on
0 of 36 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Human-Robot Mutual Learning through Affective-Linguistic Interaction and Differential Outcomes Training [Pre-Print]cited by 0
- 2025Mapping Human-Agent Co-Learning and Co-Adaptation: A Scoping Reviewcited by 0
- 2026Synthetic Linguistic Agency: How an Embodied Mortal Agent Learns Linguistic Affordances through Consequential Social Experiencecited by 0
- 2026Synthetic Linguistic Agency: How an Embodied Mortal Agent Learns Linguistic Affordances through Consequential Social Experience28 Aug 2026
- 2025Mapping Human-Agent Co-Learning and Co-Adaptation: A Scoping Review30 May 2025
- 2024Human-Robot Mutual Learning through Affective-Linguistic Interaction and Differential Outcomes Training [Pre-Print]1 Jul 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Yell At Your Robot: Improving On-the-Fly from Language Corrections
- 2023Bridging Language and Action: A Survey of Language-Conditioned Robot Manipulation
- 2024Pragmatic Embodied Spoken Instruction Following in Human-Robot Collaboration with Theory of Mind
- 2024Video-Language Critic: Transferable Reward Functions for Language-Conditioned Robotics
- 2023Scaling Up and Distilling Down: Language-Guided Robot Skill Acquisition
- 2022Interactive Language: Talking to Robots in Real Time
- 2021LILA: Language-Informed Latent Actions
- 2024Rethinking Mutual Information for Language Conditioned Skill Discovery on Imitation Learning