mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dissecting Causal Biases

arXiv 2310.13364 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurately measuring discrimination in machine learning-based automated decision systems is required to address the vital issue of fairness between subpopulations and/or individuals. Any bias in measuring discrimination can lead to either amplification or underestimation of the true value of discrimination. This paper focuses on a class of bias originating in the way training data is generated and/or collected. We call such class causal biases and use tools from the field of causality to formally define and analyze such biases. Four sources of bias are considered, namely, confounding, selection, measurement, and interaction. The main contribution of this paper is to provide, for each source of bias, a closed-form expression in terms of the model parameters. This makes it possible to analyze the behavior of each source of bias, in particular, in which cases they are absent and in which other cases they are maximized. We hope that the provided characterizations help the community better understand the sources of bias in machine learning applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2023.

Builds on

4 of 26 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  2. 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
  3. 2022Causal Discovery for Fairnesscited by 16
  4. 2019Fairness through Equality of Effortcited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.