mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

How a student becomes a teacher: learning and forgetting through Spectral methods

arXiv 2310.12612 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.NE stat.MLcited by 5

On the map: Knowledge distillation → General knowledge distillation methods

Abstract (arXiv)

In theoretical ML, the teacher-student paradigm is often employed as an effective metaphor for real-life tuition. The above scheme proves particularly relevant when the student network is overparameterized as compared to the teacher network. Under these operating conditions, it is tempting to speculate that the student ability to handle the given task could be eventually stored in a sub-portion of the whole network. This latter should be to some extent reminiscent of the frozen teacher structure, according to suitable metrics, while being approximately invariant across different architectures of the student candidate network. Unfortunately, state-of-the-art conventional learning techniques could not help in identifying the existence of such an invariant subnetwork, due to the inherent degree of non-convexity that characterizes the examined problem. In this work, we take a leap forward by proposing a radically different optimization scheme which builds on a spectral representation of the linear transfer of information between layers. The gradient is hence calculated with respect to both eigenvalues and eigenvectors with negligible increase in terms of computational and complexity load, as compared to standard training algorithms. Working in this framework, we could isolate a stable student substructure, that mirrors the true complexity of the teacher in terms of computing neurons, path distribution and topological attributes. When pruning unimportant nodes of the trained student, as follows a ranking that reflects the optimized eigenvalues, no degradation in the recorded performance is seen above a threshold that corresponds to the effective teacher size. The observed behavior can be pictured as a genuine second-order phase transition that bears universality traits.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in General knowledge distillation methods, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation. Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2023.

Builds on

17 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021Knowledge distillation: A good teacher is patient and consistent9 Jun

Other references · 16

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,180
  2. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,257
  3. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,590
  4. 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,067
  5. 2019Relational Knowledge Distillationcited by 881
  6. 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 675
  7. 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 597
  8. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 536
  9. 2021Pruning and Quantization for Deep Neural Network Acceleration: A Surveycited by 263
  10. 2017NISP: Pruning Networks using Neuron Importance Score Propagationcited by 228
  11. 2019Dynamics of stochastic gradient descent for two-layer neural networks in the teacher-student setupcited by 112
  12. 2016Group Sparse Regularization for Deep Neural Networkscited by 89
4 more
  1. 2018The committee machine: Computational to statistical gaps in learning a two-layers neural networkcited by 58
  2. 2020Machine learning in spectral domaincited by 20
  3. 2022Recurrent Spectral Network (RSN): shaping the basin of attraction of a discrete map to reach automated classificationcited by 4
  4. 2021On the training of sparse and dense deep neural networks: less parameters, same performancecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.