Privacy Preserving Large Language Models: ChatGPT Case Study Based Vision and Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools based on Large Language Models (LLMs) use billions of parameters to extensively analyse large datasets and extract critical private information such as, context, specific details, identifying information etc. This have raised serious threats to user privacy and reluctance to use such tools. This article proposes the conceptual model called PrivChatGPT, a privacy-preserving model for LLMs that consists of two main components i.e., preserving user privacy during the data curation/pre-processing together with preserving private context and the private training process for large-scale data. To demonstrate its applicability, we show how a private mechanism could be integrated into the existing model for training LLMs to protect user privacy; specifically, we employed differential privacy and private training using Reinforcement Learning (RL). We measure the privacy loss and evaluate the measure of uncertainty or randomness once differential privacy is applied. It further recursively evaluates the level of privacy guarantees and the measure of uncertainty of public database and resources, during each update when new information is added for training purposes. To critically evaluate the use of differential privacy for private LLMs, we hypothetically compared other mechanisms e..g, Blockchain, private information retrieval, randomisation, for various performance measures such as the model performance and accuracy, computational complexity, privacy vs. utility etc. We conclude that differential privacy, randomisation, and obfuscation can impact utility and performance of trained models, conversely, the use of ToR, Blockchain, and PIR may introduce additional computational complexity and high training latency. We believe that the proposed model could be used as a benchmark for proposing privacy preserving LLMs for generative AI tools.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2025A Survey on Privacy Risks and Protection in Large Language Modelscited by 21
- 2024Blockchain for Large Language Model Security and Safety: A Holistic Surveycited by 8
- 2024A Survey on Human-AI Collaboration with Large Foundation Modelscited by 7
- 2025LLM Access Shield: Domain-Specific LLM Framework for Privacy Policy Compliancecited by 6
- 2024Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Directionscited by 5
- 2024Blockchain Meets LLMs: A Living Survey on Bidirectional Integrationcited by 2
- 2026When AI Fails, What Works? A Data-Driven Taxonomy of Real-World AI Risk Mitigation Strategiescited by 2
- 2024Differentially Private Reinforcement Learning with Self-Playcited by 1
- 2026When AI Fails, What Works? A Data-Driven Taxonomy of Real-World AI Risk Mitigation Strategies4 Mar 2026
- 2025LLM Access Shield: Domain-Specific LLM Framework for Privacy Policy Compliance22 May 2025
- 2025A Survey on Privacy Risks and Protection in Large Language Models4 May 2025
- 2024Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Directions9 Dec 2024
- 2024Blockchain Meets LLMs: A Living Survey on Bidirectional Integration25 Nov 2024
- 2024Blockchain for Large Language Model Security and Safety: A Holistic Survey26 Jul 2024
- 2024Differentially Private Reinforcement Learning with Self-Play11 Apr 2024
- 2024A Survey on Human-AI Collaboration with Large Foundation Models7 Mar 2024