American Option Pricing using Self-Attention GRU and Shapley Value Interpretation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Options, serving as a crucial financial instrument, are used by investors to manage and mitigate their investment risks within the securities market. Precisely predicting the present price of an option enables investors to make informed and efficient decisions. In this paper, we propose a machine learning method for forecasting the prices of SPY (ETF) option based on gated recurrent unit (GRU) and self-attention mechanism. We first partitioned the raw dataset into 15 subsets according to moneyness and days to maturity criteria. For each subset, we matched the corresponding U.S. government bond rates and Implied Volatility Indices. This segmentation allows for a more insightful exploration of the impacts of risk-free rates and underlying volatility on option pricing. Next, we built four different machine learning models, including multilayer perceptron (MLP), long short-term memory (LSTM), self-attention LSTM, and self-attention GRU in comparison to the traditional binomial model. The empirical result shows that self-attention GRU with historical data outperforms other models due to its ability to capture complex temporal dependencies and leverage the contextual information embedded in the historical data. Finally, in order to unveil the "black box" of artificial intelligence, we employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to interpret and analyze the prediction results of the self-attention GRU model with historical data. This provides insights into the significance and contributions of different input features on the pricing of American-style options.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2023.
Builds on
8 of 86 references.
References · 8
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,539
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,024
- 2019Neural networks for option pricing and hedging: a literature reviewcited by 39
- 2021Explainable AI in Credit Risk Managementcited by 19
- 2019Supervised Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) for Pricing/Calibration of Vanilla/Exotic Options Under Various Different Processescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.