mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Language Agents for Detecting Implicit Stereotypes in Text-to-image Models at Scale

arXiv 2310.11778 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2023cs.CY cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: Diffusion models → Image generation, text-to-image and editing

Abstract (arXiv)

The recent surge in the research of diffusion models has accelerated the adoption of text-to-image models in various Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) commercial products. While these exceptional AIGC products are gaining increasing recognition and sparking enthusiasm among consumers, the questions regarding whether, when, and how these models might unintentionally reinforce existing societal stereotypes remain largely unaddressed. Motivated by recent advancements in language agents, here we introduce a novel agent architecture tailored for stereotype detection in text-to-image models. This versatile agent architecture is capable of accommodating free-form detection tasks and can autonomously invoke various tools to facilitate the entire process, from generating corresponding instructions and images, to detecting stereotypes. We build the stereotype-relevant benchmark based on multiple open-text datasets, and apply this architecture to commercial products and popular open source text-to-image models. We find that these models often display serious stereotypes when it comes to certain prompts about personal characteristics, social cultural context and crime-related aspects. In summary, these empirical findings underscore the pervasive existence of stereotypes across social dimensions, including gender, race, and religion, which not only validate the effectiveness of our proposed approach, but also emphasize the critical necessity of addressing potential ethical risks in the burgeoning realm of AIGC. As AIGC continues its rapid expansion trajectory, with new models and plugins emerging daily in staggering numbers, the challenge lies in the timely detection and mitigation of potential biases within these models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2023.

Builds on

25 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents13 Apr
  2. 2022DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Models8 Feb

Other references · 23

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  5. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
  6. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  7. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  8. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  9. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  10. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
  11. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
  12. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
11 more
  1. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  2. 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 377
  3. 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agentscited by 329
  4. 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
  5. 2023Auto-GPT for Online Decision Making: Benchmarks and Additional Opinionscited by 250
  6. 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 217
  7. 2021Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speechcited by 216
  8. 2023ReWOO: Decoupling Reasoning from Observations for Efficient Augmented Language Modelscited by 174
  9. 2023Social Biases through the Text-to-Image Generation Lenscited by 126
  10. 2018The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing Meaning through Word Embeddingscited by 87
  11. 2023SeeGULL: A Stereotype Benchmark with Broad Geo-Cultural Coverage Leveraging Generative Modelscited by 66

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Hidden Bias in the Machine: Stereotypes in Text-to-Image Models
  2. 2023Word-Level Explanations for Analyzing Bias in Text-to-Image Models
  3. 2023On The Role of Reasoning in the Identification of Subtle Stereotypes in Natural Language
  4. 2024AI-generated faces influence gender stereotypes and racial homogenization
  5. 2024Identifying Implicit Social Biases in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2023RS-Corrector: Correcting the Racial Stereotypes in Latent Diffusion Models
  7. 2024Image-Perfect Imperfections: Safety, Bias, and Authenticity in the Shadow of Text-To-Image Model Evolution
  8. 2025Implicit Bias Injection Attacks against Text-to-Image Diffusion Models