Exploring Automatic Evaluation Methods based on a Decoder-based LLM for Text Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic evaluation of text generation is essential for improving the accuracy of generation tasks. In light of the current trend towards increasingly larger decoder-based language models, we investigate automatic evaluation methods based on such models for text generation. This paper compares various methods, including tuning with encoder-based models and large language models under equal conditions, on two different tasks, machine translation evaluation and semantic textual similarity, in two languages, Japanese and English. Experimental results show that compared to the tuned encoder-based models, the tuned decoder-based models perform poorly. The analysis of the causes for this suggests that the decoder-based models focus on surface word sequences and do not capture meaning. It is also revealed that in-context learning of very large decoder-based models such as ChatGPT makes it difficult to identify fine-grained semantic differences.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2023.
Builds on
22 of 38 references.
References · 22
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
10 more
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
- 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
- 2022Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Modelcited by 559
- 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 361
- 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 361
- 2021Learning Compact Metrics for MTcited by 93
- 2022T5Score: Discriminative Fine-tuning of Generative Evaluation Metricscited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.