mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LLMs as Potential Brainstorming Partners for Math and Science Problems

arXiv 2310.10677 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the recent rise of widely successful deep learning models, there is emerging interest among professionals in various math and science communities to see and evaluate the state-of-the-art models' abilities to collaborate on finding or solving problems that often require creativity and thus brainstorming. While a significant chasm still exists between current human-machine intellectual collaborations and the resolution of complex math and science problems, such as the six unsolved Millennium Prize Problems, our initial investigation into this matter reveals a promising step towards bridging the divide. This is due to the recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs). More specifically, we conduct comprehensive case studies to explore both the capabilities and limitations of the current state-of-the-art LLM, notably GPT-4, in collective brainstorming with humans.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2023.

Builds on

5 of 19 references.

References · 5

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  4. 2019Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists' Perceptions of Automated AIcited by 79
  5. 2019Enhancing the Transformer with Explicit Relational Encoding for Math Problem Solvingcited by 35

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

6 papers.