Recursively-Constrained Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many sequential decision problems involve optimizing one objective function while imposing constraints on other objectives. Constrained Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (C-POMDP) model this case with transition uncertainty and partial observability. In this work, we first show that C-POMDPs violate the optimal substructure property over successive decision steps and thus may exhibit behaviors that are undesirable for some (e.g., safety critical) applications. Additionally, online re-planning in C-POMDPs is often ineffective due to the inconsistency resulting from this violation. To address these drawbacks, we introduce the Recursively-Constrained POMDP (RC-POMDP), which imposes additional history-dependent cost constraints on the C-POMDP. We show that, unlike C-POMDPs, RC-POMDPs always have deterministic optimal policies and that optimal policies obey Bellman's principle of optimality. We also present a point-based dynamic programming algorithm for RC-POMDPs. Evaluations on benchmark problems demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithm and show that policies for RC-POMDPs produce more desirable behaviors than policies for C-POMDPs.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2023.
Builds on
5 of 42 references.
References · 5
- 2022Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes in Robotics: A Surveycited by 81
- 2018Trust-Aware Decision Making for Human-Robot Collaboration: Model Learning and Planningcited by 32
- 2022Optimal Control of Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes with Finite Linear Temporal Logic Constraintscited by 5
- 2022Online Planning for Constrained POMDPs with Continuous Spaces through Dual Ascentcited by 5
- 2022Recursive Constraints to Prevent Instability in Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.