mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging Twitter Data for Sentiment Analysis of Transit User Feedback: An NLP Framework

arXiv 2310.07086 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2023cs.AI cs.SIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional methods of collecting user feedback through transit surveys are often time-consuming, resource intensive, and costly. In this paper, we propose a novel NLP-based framework that harnesses the vast, abundant, and inexpensive data available on social media platforms like Twitter to understand users' perceptions of various service issues. Twitter, being a microblogging platform, hosts a wealth of real-time user-generated content that often includes valuable feedback and opinions on various products, services, and experiences. The proposed framework streamlines the process of gathering and analyzing user feedback without the need for costly and time-consuming user feedback surveys using two techniques. First, it utilizes few-shot learning for tweet classification within predefined categories, allowing effective identification of the issues described in tweets. It then employs a lexicon-based sentiment analysis model to assess the intensity and polarity of the tweet sentiments, distinguishing between positive, negative, and neutral tweets. The effectiveness of the framework was validated on a subset of manually labeled Twitter data and was applied to the NYC subway system as a case study. The framework accurately classifies tweets into predefined categories related to safety, reliability, and maintenance of the subway system and effectively measured sentiment intensities within each category. The general findings were corroborated through a comparison with an agency-run customer survey conducted in the same year. The findings highlight the effectiveness of the proposed framework in gauging user feedback through inexpensive social media data to understand the pain points of the transit system and plan for targeted improvements.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2023.

Builds on

17 of 83 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  5. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  6. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  7. 2020Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 504
  8. 2021Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Modelscited by 278
  9. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 275
  10. 2019An Embarrassingly Simple Approach for Transfer Learning from Pretrained Language Modelscited by 39
  11. 2015Better Document-level Sentiment Analysis from RST Discourse Parsingcited by 20
  12. 2023Just Another Day on Twitter: A Complete 24 Hours of Twitter Datacited by 14
5 more
  1. 2020Detecting Topic and Sentiment Dynamics Due to COVID-19 Pandemic Using Social Mediacited by 12
  2. 2022A Generative Language Model for Few-shot Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysiscited by 7
  3. 2021Hostility Detection in Hindi leveraging Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 6
  4. 2016Mining Social Media for Open Innovation in Transportation Systemscited by 1
  5. 2017Fuzzy Ontology-Based Sentiment Analysis of Transportation and City Feature Reviews for Safe Travelingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.