FTFT: Efficient and Robust Fine-Tuning by Transferring Training Dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the massive success of fine-tuning Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs), they remain susceptible to out-of-distribution input. Dataset cartography is a simple yet effective dual-model approach that improves the robustness of fine-tuned PLMs. It involves fine-tuning a model on the original training set (i.e. reference model), selecting a subset of important training instances based on the training dynamics, and fine-tuning again only on these selected examples (i.e. main model). However, this approach requires fine-tuning the same model twice, which is computationally expensive for large PLMs. In this paper, we show that (1) training dynamics are highly transferable across model sizes and pre-training methods, and that (2) fine-tuning main models using these selected training instances achieves higher training efficiency than empirical risk minimization (ERM). Building on these observations, we propose a novel fine-tuning approach: Fine-Tuning by transFerring Training dynamics (FTFT). Compared with dataset cartography, FTFT uses more efficient reference models and aggressive early stopping. FTFT achieves robustness improvements over ERM while lowering the training cost by up to ~ 50%.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2023.
Builds on
36 of 48 references.
References · 36
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
24 more
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 530
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 425
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 399
- 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 339
- 2020On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselinescited by 255
- 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
- 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 221
- 2022WANLI: Worker and AI Collaboration for Natural Language Inference Dataset Creationcited by 202
- 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 172
- 2018Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 152
- 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
- 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 141
- 2023Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluationcited by 136
- 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
- 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 128
- 2020Mind the Trade-off: Debiasing NLU Models without Degrading the In-distribution Performancecited by 85
- 2020Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling themcited by 83
- 2022ID and OOD Performance Are Sometimes Inversely Correlated on Real-world Datasetscited by 44
- 2023Measuring the Instability of Fine-Tuningcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.