Estimating Shape Distances on Neural Representations with Limited Samples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Measuring geometric similarity between high-dimensional network representations is a topic of longstanding interest to neuroscience and deep learning. Although many methods have been proposed, only a few works have rigorously analyzed their statistical efficiency or quantified estimator uncertainty in data-limited regimes. Here, we derive upper and lower bounds on the worst-case convergence of standard estimators of shape distanceunicodex2014a measure of representational dissimilarity proposed by Williams et al. (2021).These bounds reveal the challenging nature of the problem in high-dimensional feature spaces. To overcome these challenges, we introduce a new method-of-moments estimator with a tunable bias-variance tradeoff. We show that this estimator achieves substantially lower bias than standard estimators in simulation and on neural data, particularly in high-dimensional settings. Thus, we lay the foundation for a rigorous statistical theory for high-dimensional shape analysis, and we contribute a new estimation method that is well-suited to practical scientific settings.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2023.
Builds on
16 of 44 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,165
- 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
- 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 245
- 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 131
- 2021Generalized Shape Metrics on Neural Representationscited by 112
- 2019Universality and individuality in neural dynamics across large populations of recurrent networkscited by 61
- 2019Recurrence is required to capture the representational dynamics of the human visual systemcited by 58
- 2022Representational dissimilarity metric spaces for stochastic neural networkscited by 17
- 2018Estimating the Spectral Density of Large Implicit Matricescited by 16
4 more
- 2021Statistical inference on representational geometriescited by 13
- 2016Spectrum Estimation from Samplescited by 10
- 2022Neural Networks as Paths through the Space of Representationscited by 5
- 2021Statistical Neuroscience in the Single Trial Limitcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024What Representational Similarity Measures Imply about Decodable Informationcited by 18
- 2025Spectral Analysis of Representational Similarity with Limited Neuronscited by 2
- 2025Can Biologically Plausible Temporal Credit Assignment Rules Match BPTT for Neural Similarity? E-prop as an Examplecited by 1
- 2026Stimulus symmetries can confound representational similarity analysescited by 1
- 2026Stimulus symmetries can confound representational similarity analyses20 May 2026
- 2025Can Biologically Plausible Temporal Credit Assignment Rules Match BPTT for Neural Similarity? E-prop as an Example7 Jun 2025
- 2025Spectral Analysis of Representational Similarity with Limited Neurons27 Feb 2025
- 2024What Representational Similarity Measures Imply about Decodable Information12 Nov 2024