mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

XAL: EXplainable Active Learning Makes Classifiers Better Low-resource Learners

arXiv 2310.05502 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active learning (AL), which aims to construct an effective training set by iteratively curating the most formative unlabeled data for annotation, has been widely used in low-resource tasks. Most active learning techniques in classification rely on the model's uncertainty or disagreement to choose unlabeled data, suffering from the problem of over-confidence in superficial patterns and a lack of exploration. Inspired by the cognitive processes in which humans deduce and predict through causal information, we take an initial attempt towards integrating rationales into AL and propose a novel Explainable Active Learning framework (XAL) for low-resource text classification, which aims to encourage classifiers to justify their inferences and delve into unlabeled data for which they cannot provide reasonable explanations. Specifically, besides using a pre-trained bi-directional encoder for classification, we employ a pre-trained uni-directional decoder to generate and score the explanation. We further facilitate the alignment of the model with human reasoning preference through a proposed ranking loss. During the selection of unlabeled data, the predicted uncertainty of the encoder and the explanation score of the decoder complement each other as the final metric to acquire informative data. Extensive experiments on six datasets show that XAL achieves consistent improvement over 9 strong baselines. Analysis indicates that the proposed method can generate corresponding explanations for its predictions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2023.

Builds on

37 of 77 references.

References · 37

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  5. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  6. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  7. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  8. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  9. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
  10. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
  11. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
  12. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
25 more
  1. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
  2. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
  3. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 737
  4. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 669
  5. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 639
  6. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 610
  7. 2022ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generationcited by 211
  8. 2021Active Learning by Acquiring Contrastive Examplescited by 156
  9. 2020WT5?! Training Text-to-Text Models to Explain their Predictionscited by 148
  10. 2020Leakage-Adjusted Simulatability: Can Models Generate Non-Trivial Explanations of Their Behavior in Natural Language?cited by 95
  11. 2023Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Taskscited by 89
  12. 2021When Can Models Learn From Explanations? A Formal Framework for Understanding the Roles of Explanation Datacited by 75
  13. 2020Robustness to Spurious Correlations via Human Annotationscited by 62
  14. 2021Revisiting Uncertainty-based Query Strategies for Active Learning with Transformerscited by 60
  15. 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processingcited by 40
  16. 2020ALICE: Active Learning with Contrastive Natural Language Explanationscited by 36
  17. 2023ReGen: Zero-Shot Text Classification via Training Data Generation with Progressive Dense Retrievalcited by 26
  18. 2022ALLSH: Active Learning Guided by Local Sensitivity and Hardnesscited by 23
  19. 2021Diversity Enhanced Active Learning with Strictly Proper Scoring Rulescited by 22
  20. 2023"Why is this misleading?": Detecting News Headline Hallucinations with Explanationscited by 17
  21. 2022Exploiting Sentiment and Common Sense for Zero-shot Stance Detectioncited by 16
  22. 2021Teaching an Active Learner with Contrastive Examplescited by 12
  23. 2023Reliable Natural Language Understanding with Large Language Models and Answer Set Programmingcited by 12
  24. 2022Challenges for Open-domain Targeted Sentiment Analysiscited by 9
  25. 2023Improving (Dis)agreement Detection with Inductive Social Relation Information From Comment-Reply Interactionscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.