mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Interpretability and Generalizability in Extended Isolation Forests

arXiv 2310.05468 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2023stat.ML cs.LG stat.APcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anomaly Detection (AD) focuses on identifying unusual behaviors in complex datasets. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms and Decision Support Systems (DSSs) provide effective solutions for AD, but detecting anomalies alone may not be enough, especially in engineering, where diagnostics and maintenance are crucial. Users need clear explanations to support root cause analysis and build trust in the model. The unsupervised nature of AD, however, makes interpretability a challenge. This paper introduces Extended Isolation Forest Feature Importance (ExIFFI), a method that explains predictions made by Extended Isolation Forest (EIF) models, which split data using hyperplanes. ExIFFI provides explanations at both global and local levels by leveraging feature importance. We also present an improved version, Enhanced Extended Isolation Forest (EIF+), designed to enhance the model's ability to detect unseen anomalies through a revised splitting strategy. Using five synthetic and eleven real-world datasets, we conduct a comparative analysis, evaluating unsupervised AD methods with the Average Precision metric. EIF+ consistently outperforms EIF across all datasets when trained without anomalies, demonstrating better generalization. To assess ExIFFI's interpretability, we introduce the Area Under the Curve of Feature Selection (AUCFS), a novel metric using feature selection as a proxy task. ExIFFI outperforms other unsupervised interpretability methods on 8 of 11 real-world datasets and successfully identifies anomalous features in synthetic datasets. When trained only on inliers, ExIFFI also outperforms competing models on real-world data and accurately detects anomalous features in synthetic datasets. We provide open-source code to encourage further research and reproducibility.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2023.

Builds on

17 of 55 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  3. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  4. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  5. 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 423
  6. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
  7. 2022ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functionscited by 153
  8. 2022Deep Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detectioncited by 90
  9. 2021A survey of Bayesian Network structure learningcited by 85
  10. 2018Extended Isolation Forestcited by 78
  11. 2022Evaluation of post-hoc interpretability methods in time-series classificationcited by 53
  12. 2022A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detectioncited by 39
5 more
  1. 2020Feature Importance Ranking for Deep Learningcited by 31
  2. 2021An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach for Unsupervised Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Rotating Machinerycited by 22
  3. 2023Unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms on real-world data: how many do we need?cited by 20
  4. 2021A new interpretable unsupervised anomaly detection method based on residual explanationcited by 4
  5. 2023An Iterative Method for Unsupervised Robust Anomaly Detection Under Data Contaminationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.