mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EMO: Earth Mover Distance Optimization for Auto-Regressive Language Modeling

arXiv 2310.04691 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural language models are probabilistic models of human text. They are predominantly trained using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), which is equivalent to minimizing the forward cross-entropy between the empirical data distribution and the model distribution. However, various degeneration phenomena are still widely observed when decoding from the distributions learned by such models. We establish that the forward cross-entropy is suboptimal as a distance metric for aligning human and model distribution due to its (1) recall-prioritization (2) negative diversity ignorance and (3) train-test mismatch. In this paper, we propose Earth Mover Distance Optimization (EMO) for auto-regressive language modeling. EMO capitalizes on the inherent properties of earth mover distance to address the aforementioned challenges. Due to the high complexity of direct computation, we further introduce a feasible upper bound for EMO to ease end-to-end training. Upon extensive evaluation of language models trained using EMO and MLE. We find that EMO demonstrates a consistently better language modeling performance than MLE across domains. Moreover, EMO demonstrates noteworthy enhancements in downstream performance with minimal fine-tuning on merely 25,000 sentences. This highlights the tremendous potential of EMO as a lightweight calibration method for enhancing large-scale pre-trained language models.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2023.

Builds on

36 of 70 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  7. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  8. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  9. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  10. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  11. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
  12. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
24 more
  1. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
  2. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  3. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  4. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  5. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 676
  6. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
  7. 2018Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recallcited by 401
  8. 2017Wasserstein Auto-Encoderscited by 371
  9. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
  10. 2018SentEval: An Evaluation Toolkit for Universal Sentence Representationscited by 294
  11. 2017Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Studycited by 267
  12. 2015Learning with a Wasserstein Losscited by 194
  13. 2022BRIO: Bringing Order to Abstractive Summarizationcited by 161
  14. 2022Self-Adaptive In-Context Learning: An Information Compression Perspective for In-Context Example Selection and Orderingcited by 158
  15. 2023Platypus: Quick, Cheap, and Powerful Refinement of LLMscited by 150
  16. 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 137
  17. 2022Locally Typical Samplingcited by 108
  18. 2016Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Predictioncited by 80
  19. 2020Text Generation by Learning from Demonstrationscited by 64
  20. 2023OpenICL: An Open-Source Framework for In-context Learningcited by 51
  21. 2023Tailoring Language Generation Models under Total Variation Distancecited by 27
  22. 2022Evaluating Distributional Distortion in Neural Language Modelingcited by 18
  23. 2023On the Efficacy of Sampling Adapterscited by 17
  24. 2023MixCE: Training Autoregressive Language Models by Mixing Forward and Reverse Cross-Entropiescited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

7 papers.