EMO: Earth Mover Distance Optimization for Auto-Regressive Language Modeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural language models are probabilistic models of human text. They are predominantly trained using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), which is equivalent to minimizing the forward cross-entropy between the empirical data distribution and the model distribution. However, various degeneration phenomena are still widely observed when decoding from the distributions learned by such models. We establish that the forward cross-entropy is suboptimal as a distance metric for aligning human and model distribution due to its (1) recall-prioritization (2) negative diversity ignorance and (3) train-test mismatch. In this paper, we propose Earth Mover Distance Optimization (EMO) for auto-regressive language modeling. EMO capitalizes on the inherent properties of earth mover distance to address the aforementioned challenges. Due to the high complexity of direct computation, we further introduce a feasible upper bound for EMO to ease end-to-end training. Upon extensive evaluation of language models trained using EMO and MLE. We find that EMO demonstrates a consistently better language modeling performance than MLE across domains. Moreover, EMO demonstrates noteworthy enhancements in downstream performance with minimal fine-tuning on merely 25,000 sentences. This highlights the tremendous potential of EMO as a lightweight calibration method for enhancing large-scale pre-trained language models.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2023.
Builds on
36 of 70 references.
References · 36
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
24 more
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
- 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 676
- 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
- 2018Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recallcited by 401
- 2017Wasserstein Auto-Encoderscited by 371
- 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
- 2018SentEval: An Evaluation Toolkit for Universal Sentence Representationscited by 294
- 2017Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Studycited by 267
- 2015Learning with a Wasserstein Losscited by 194
- 2022BRIO: Bringing Order to Abstractive Summarizationcited by 161
- 2022Self-Adaptive In-Context Learning: An Information Compression Perspective for In-Context Example Selection and Orderingcited by 158
- 2023Platypus: Quick, Cheap, and Powerful Refinement of LLMscited by 150
- 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 137
- 2022Locally Typical Samplingcited by 108
- 2016Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Predictioncited by 80
- 2020Text Generation by Learning from Demonstrationscited by 64
- 2023OpenICL: An Open-Source Framework for In-context Learningcited by 51
- 2023Tailoring Language Generation Models under Total Variation Distancecited by 27
- 2022Evaluating Distributional Distortion in Neural Language Modelingcited by 18
- 2023On the Efficacy of Sampling Adapterscited by 17
- 2023MixCE: Training Autoregressive Language Models by Mixing Forward and Reverse Cross-Entropiescited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024Improving Open-Ended Text Generation via Adaptive Decodingcited by 21
- 2024Semantic Loss Guided Data Efficient Supervised Fine Tuning for Safe Responses in LLMscited by 4
- 2025Teaching Metric Distance to Discrete Autoregressive Language Modelscited by 3
- 2025PanoGrounder: Bridging 2D and 3D with Panoramic Scene Representations for VLM-based 3D Visual Groundingcited by 3
- 2026Perturbation is All You Need for Extrapolating Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Learning Perturbations to Extrapolate Your LLMcited by 0
- 2026DEL: Digit Entropy Loss for Numerical Learning of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026DEL: Digit Entropy Loss for Numerical Learning of Large Language Models19 May 2026
- 2026Learning Perturbations to Extrapolate Your LLM13 May 2026
- 2026Perturbation is All You Need for Extrapolating Language Models5 May 2026
- 2025PanoGrounder: Bridging 2D and 3D with Panoramic Scene Representations for VLM-based 3D Visual Grounding24 Dec 2025
- 2025Teaching Metric Distance to Discrete Autoregressive Language Models4 Mar 2025
- 2024Semantic Loss Guided Data Efficient Supervised Fine Tuning for Safe Responses in LLMs7 Dec 2024
- 2024Improving Open-Ended Text Generation via Adaptive Decoding28 Feb 2024