Auto-survey Challenge
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a novel platform for evaluating the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously compose and critique survey papers spanning a vast array of disciplines including sciences, humanities, education, and law. Within this framework, AI systems undertake a simulated peer-review mechanism akin to traditional scholarly journals, with human organizers serving in an editorial oversight capacity. Within this framework, we organized a competition for the AutoML conference 2023. Entrants are tasked with presenting stand-alone models adept at authoring articles from designated prompts and subsequently appraising them. Assessment criteria include clarity, reference appropriateness, accountability, and the substantive value of the content. This paper presents the design of the competition, including the implementation baseline submissions and methods of evaluation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2023.
Builds on
5 of 6 references.
References · 5
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2022A New Generation of Perspective API: Efficient Multilingual Character-level Transformerscited by 181
- 2021Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experimentcited by 49
- 2019Assessing the Quality of Scientific Paperscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.