mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tuning In to Neural Encoding: Linking Human Brain and Artificial Supervised Representations of Language

arXiv 2310.04460 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To understand the algorithm that supports the human brain's language representation, previous research has attempted to predict neural responses to linguistic stimuli using embeddings generated by artificial neural networks (ANNs), a process known as neural encoding. However, most of these studies have focused on probing neural representations of Germanic languages, such as English, with unsupervised ANNs. In this paper, we propose to bridge the gap between human brain and supervised ANN representations of the Chinese language. Specifically, we investigate how task tuning influences a pretained Transformer for neural encoding and which tasks lead to the best encoding performances. We generate supervised representations on eight Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tasks using prompt-tuning, a technique that is seldom explored in neural encoding for language. We demonstrate that prompt-tuning yields representations that better predict neural responses to Chinese stimuli than traditional fine-tuning on four tasks. Furthermore, we discover that tasks that require a fine-grained processing of concepts and entities lead to representations that are most predictive of brain activation patterns. Additionally, we reveal that the proportion of tuned parameters highly influences the neural encoding performance of fine-tuned models. Overall, our experimental findings could help us better understand the relationship between supervised artificial and brain language representations.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2023.

Builds on

17 of 40 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  3. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  4. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  5. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  6. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  7. 2020Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 504
  8. 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 376
  9. 2020CLUE: A Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 277
  10. 2020Revisiting Pre-Trained Models for Chinese Natural Language Processingcited by 262
  11. 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
  12. 2021KnowPrompt: Knowledge-aware Prompt-tuning with Synergistic Optimization for Relation Extractioncited by 180
5 more
  1. 2023Contrast, Attend and Diffuse to Decode High-Resolution Images from Brain Activitiescited by 36
  2. 2022Neural Language Taskonomy: Which NLP Tasks are the most Predictive of fMRI Brain Activity?cited by 27
  3. 2021Model-based analysis of brain activity reveals the hierarchy of language in 305 subjectscited by 10
  4. 2023Fine-tuned vs. Prompt-tuned Supervised Representations: Which Better Account for Brain Language Representations?cited by 8
  5. 2016Mapping Between fMRI Responses to Movies and their Natural Language Annotationscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.