mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can neural networks count digit frequency?

arXiv 2310.04431 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this research, we aim to compare the performance of different classical machine learning models and neural networks in identifying the frequency of occurrence of each digit in a given number. It has various applications in machine learning and computer vision, e.g. for obtaining the frequency of a target object in a visual scene. We considered this problem as a hybrid of classification and regression tasks. We carefully create our own datasets to observe systematic differences between different methods. We evaluate each of the methods using different metrics across multiple datasets.The metrics of performance used were the root mean squared error and mean absolute error for regression evaluation, and accuracy for classification performance evaluation. We observe that decision trees and random forests overfit to the dataset, due to their inherent bias, and are not able to generalize well. We also observe that the neural networks significantly outperform the classical machine learning models in terms of both the regression and classification metrics for both the 6-digit and 10-digit number datasets. Dataset and code are available on github.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2023.

Builds on

6 of 19 references.

References · 6

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639

Built on by

Not cited yet.