mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

History Matching for Geological Carbon Storage using Data-Space Inversion with Spatio-Temporal Data Parameterization

arXiv 2310.03228 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2023cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

History matching based on monitoring data will enable uncertainty reduction, and thus improved aquifer management, in industrial-scale carbon storage operations. In traditional model-based data assimilation, geomodel parameters are modified to force agreement between flow simulation results and observations. In data-space inversion (DSI), history-matched quantities of interest, e.g., posterior pressure and saturation fields conditioned to observations, are inferred directly, without constructing posterior geomodels. This is accomplished efficiently using a set of O(1000) prior simulation results, data parameterization, and posterior sampling within a Bayesian setting. In this study, we develop and implement (in DSI) a deep-learning-based parameterization to represent spatio-temporal pressure and CO2 saturation fields at a set of time steps. The new parameterization uses an adversarial autoencoder (AAE) for dimension reduction and a convolutional long short-term memory (convLSTM) network to represent the spatial distribution and temporal evolution of the pressure and saturation fields. This parameterization is used with an ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation (ESMDA) in the DSI framework to enable posterior predictions. A realistic 3D system characterized by prior geological realizations drawn from a range of geological scenarios is considered. A local grid refinement procedure is introduced to estimate the error covariance term that appears in the history matching formulation. Extensive history matching results are presented for various quantities, for multiple synthetic true models. Substantial uncertainty reduction in posterior pressure and saturation fields is achieved in all cases. The framework is applied to efficiently provide posterior predictions for a range of error covariance specifications. Such an assessment would be expensive using a model-based approach.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2023.

Builds on

11 of 53 references.

References · 11

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 364
  3. 2021U-FNO -- An enhanced Fourier neural operator-based deep-learning model for multiphase flowcited by 297
  4. 2018Deep convolutional encoder-decoder networks for uncertainty quantification of dynamic multiphase flow in heterogeneous mediacited by 56
  5. 2023Fourier-MIONet: Fourier-enhanced multiple-input neural operators for multiphase modeling of geological carbon sequestrationcited by 46
  6. 2017Training-image based geostatistical inversion using a spatial generative adversarial neural networkcited by 32
  7. 20203D CNN-PCA: A Deep-Learning-Based Parameterization for Complex Geomodelscited by 13
  8. 2021A Robust Deep Learning Workflow to Predict Multiphase Flow Behavior during Geological CO2 Sequestration Injection and Post-Injection Periodscited by 10
  9. 2023Surrogate Model for Geological CO2 Storage and Its Use in Hierarchical MCMC History Matchingcited by 9
  10. 2021Deep-learning-based coupled flow-geomechanics surrogate model for CO2 sequestrationcited by 7
  11. 2020Data-Space Inversion Using a Recurrent Autoencoder for Time-Series Parameterizationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.