Attributing Learned Concepts in Neural Networks to Training Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
By now there is substantial evidence that deep learning models learn certain human-interpretable features as part of their internal representations of data. As having the right (or wrong) concepts is critical to trustworthy machine learning systems, it is natural to ask which inputs from the model's original training set were most important for learning a concept at a given layer. To answer this, we combine data attribution methods with methods for probing the concepts learned by a model. Training network and probe ensembles for two concept datasets on a range of network layers, we use the recently developed TRAK method for large-scale data attribution. We find some evidence for convergence, where removing the 10,000 top attributing images for a concept and retraining the model does not change the location of the concept in the network nor the probing sparsity of the concept. This suggests that rather than being highly dependent on a few specific examples, the features that inform the development of a concept are spread in a more diffuse manner across its exemplars, implying robustness in concept formation.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2023.
Builds on
14 of 19 references.
References · 14
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 311
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 273
- 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 144
- 2021Acquisition of Chess Knowledge in AlphaZerocited by 120
- 2023Language Models Implement Simple Word2Vec-style Vector Arithmeticcited by 97
- 2023FFCV: Accelerating Training by Removing Data Bottleneckscited by 49
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.