mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exact and soft boundary conditions in Physics-Informed Neural Networks for the Variable Coefficient Poisson equation

arXiv 2310.02548 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2023cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Boundary conditions (BCs) are a key component in every Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN). By defining the solution to partial differential equations (PDEs) along domain boundaries, BCs constrain the underlying boundary value problem (BVP) that a PINN tries to approximate. Without them, unique PDE solutions may not exist and finding approximations with PINNs would be a challenging, if not impossible task. This study examines how soft loss-based and exact distance function-based BC imposition approaches differ when applied in PINNs. The well known variable coefficient Poisson equation serves as the target PDE for all PINN models trained in this work. Besides comparing BC imposition approaches, the goal of this work is to also provide resources on how to implement these PINNs in practice. To this end, Keras models with Tensorflow backend as well as a Python notebook with code examples and step-by-step explanations on how to build soft/exact BC PINNs are published alongside this review.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2023.

Builds on

4 of 8 references.

References · 4

  1. 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 277
  2. 2021Exact imposition of boundary conditions with distance functions in physics-informed deep neural networkscited by 135
  3. 2021Multi-Objective Loss Balancing for Physics-Informed Deep Learningcited by 86
  4. 2022Learning differentiable solvers for systems with hard constraintscited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.